Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

West Virginia's New Law Addresses Insurance Denials Following Tragic Case

4/1/2026, 4:31:28 AM

Background on Eric Tennant's Case

Eric Tennant, a 58-year-old coal mining safety instructor from Bridgeport, West Virginia, died in September 2022 after struggling for months with his health insurer, the Public Employees Insurance Agency (PEIA), over coverage for a recommended cancer treatment. Tennant was battling stage 4 bile duct cancer and sought a $50,000 noninvasive procedure known as histotripsy, which aimed to target and potentially shrink a tumor in his liver. Despite the urgency of his condition, PEIA denied coverage, labeling the treatment as “experimental and investigational.” His widow, Becky Tennant, recounted her efforts to appeal the denial, which included submitting medical records and contacting state representatives for assistance.

Legislative Response to Insurance Denials

In response to Tennant's case and similar situations, West Virginia's Republican Governor Patrick Morrisey signed a new bill aimed at reforming the prior authorization process for health insurance. The law, effective June 10, 2023, allows patients whose treatments have been preapproved to pursue alternative medically appropriate treatments without needing additional authorization. Delegate Laura Kimble, who introduced the legislation, emphasized that had this law been in place earlier, Tennant could have received histotripsy without the lengthy approval process, as it was a less expensive alternative to chemotherapy already authorized by PEIA.

Broader Context of Prior Authorization Laws

The issue of prior authorization is not unique to West Virginia; it has become a significant concern across the United States. According to a report by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, by late 2025, 49 states, along with the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, had enacted some form of prior authorization law. These laws vary, with some limiting the response time for insurers and others preventing retrospective denials after services have been preauthorized. The trend reflects a growing recognition of the burdens that prior authorization processes place on patients, particularly those requiring urgent care.

Official Statements and Industry Perspectives

Governor Morrisey stated that the legislation is grounded in the principle of allowing patients to make informed decisions about their care without unnecessary hurdles. He described the law as a measure of “common sense, compassion, and trust” in patients and their doctors. However, the health insurance industry, represented by the trade group AHIP, argues that prior authorization serves as a necessary safeguard against potential harm and helps control healthcare costs. Critics, including patient advocates, express skepticism about the effectiveness of such reforms, citing ongoing challenges in accessing timely care.

Criticism and Opposition

Despite the legislative progress, skepticism remains regarding the implementation and impact of the new law. Becky Tennant, who advocated for the bill, expressed concerns that families should not have to fight for access to time-sensitive care. She noted that the passage of the law feels bittersweet, as it came too late for her husband. The financial implications of the new law are also uncertain, with estimates suggesting it could cost PEIA approximately $13 million annually.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Families should not have to beg, appeal, or go public just to access time-sensitive care,” — Becky Tennant, Widow of Eric Tennant
  • “This legislation is rooted in a simple principle: if a treatment has already been approved, patients should be able to pursue a medically appropriate alternative without being forced to start the process over again — especially when it does not cost more,” — Governor Patrick Morrisey

The new law represents a significant step towards addressing the challenges posed by prior authorization in West Virginia, but the effectiveness of these reforms will depend on their implementation and the response from health insurers.