Lebanon's Military Dilemma: Confronting Hezbollah Amidst Conflict

Lebanon's government and military face increasing scrutiny regarding their approach to Hezbollah's disarmament. Critics argue that both the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the government have been hesitant to confront Hezbollah, which possesses more weapons and resources than previously acknowledged. The situation is exacerbated by Hezbollah's continued financial support from Iran, raising concerns about the potential for violent resistance should the LAF attempt to seize the group's arsenal. As Israeli forces advance toward the Litani River, the LAF is under pressure to secure the area between the Litani and Awwali rivers, a strategic zone that could become a new frontline for Hezbollah.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Tensions have emerged between LAF Commander Rudolph Haykal and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, particularly following the government's declaration of Hezbollah's military activities as illegal. Haykal has reportedly expressed concerns about the LAF's capability to enforce this decision, citing underfunding and the risk of significant casualties if the army engages in direct conflict with Hezbollah. Critics have called for Haykal's dismissal, suggesting he is reluctant to alienate Hezbollah due to potential political aspirations. However, it is widely recognized that any military confrontation could escalate into broader sectarian conflict, undermining the LAF's effectiveness and credibility.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

In light of the ongoing conflict, Haykal and the Lebanese government must devise a strategy to prevent Hezbollah from expanding its military presence in critical areas. The government’s recent decision to declare Hezbollah's activities illegal, supported by a majority of Shiite ministers, provides a foundation for action. The LAF is encouraged to establish a military presence south of the Zahrani River, potentially using U.S. mediation in discussions with Israel. This strategy aims to neutralize the region and prevent Hezbollah from launching attacks against Israel, while also detaining members of the group.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

The Lebanese government must engage in imaginative diplomacy to secure military positioning in the contested areas. This includes coordinating with the United Nations to oversee the implementation of resolutions regarding Lebanon. The goal is to ensure that the state retains the exclusive right to hold weapons in these regions, thereby limiting Hezbollah's influence. However, this approach risks localized clashes if Hezbollah resists the LAF's presence.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

Rudolph Haykal's cautious approach to confronting Hezbollah reflects a broader understanding of the complexities involved. While he must avoid turning the LAF into a tool for resolving the Hezbollah issue, he also needs to maintain the army's credibility by developing actionable plans aligned with government decisions. The area between the Litani and Awwali rivers stands as a critical focal point for Lebanon's military strategy moving forward, demanding both strategic foresight and diplomatic engagement to navigate the challenges ahead.

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

• “A blunter reason is that the army cannot militarily defeat Hezbollah, and if it tried to do so, it would cause tremendous damage to itself.” — Anonymous, Military Analyst

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace

• “What is imperative, however, is to prevent this area from being fully ceded to Hezbollah in its conflict with Israel, because if the Israelis decide to also make the region unlivable, it could push the Shiite population into non-Shiite areas of Mount Lebanon, generating domestic discord that undermine what remains of the stability of the state.” — Anonymous, Regional Expert

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace