Story perspectives

Supreme Court Weighs Birthright Citizenship Amid Trump's Policy

4/2/2026

Summary

Story summary

The Supreme Court signaled inclination to uphold the Fourteenth Amendment on April 1, 2026, with U.S. President Donald Trump present.
Solicitor General John Sauer defended an executive order limiting birthright citizenship before the justices.
Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether Native Americans are birthright citizens, referencing the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent.
Sauer hesitantly affirmed that Native Americans are birthright citizens.
Critics label Trump's birthright citizenship policy as exclusionary and unconstitutional.

History

Historical Context

The 1898 Supreme Court case United States v. Wong Kim Ark affirmed that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment. This ruling countered earlier exclusionary laws, such as the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. Today, the Supreme Court's review of birthright citizenship, influenced by recent executive orders, echoes this historical struggle over citizenship rights and implications for Native Americans.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Supreme Court signaled inclination to uphold the Fourteenth Amendment on April 1, 2026, with U.S. President Donald Trump present.
Solicitor General John Sauer defended an executive order limiting birthright citizenship before the justices.
Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether Native Americans are birthright citizens, referencing the 1898 Wong Kim Ark precedent.
Sauer hesitantly affirmed that Native Americans are birthright citizens.
Critics label Trump's birthright citizenship policy as exclusionary and unconstitutional.

1 / 2