Full Breakdown
Allegations of Contract Killing in Vevor-Egreen Dispute
4/2/2026, 8:47:52 PM
Overview of the Dispute
A significant legal conflict has emerged between Vevor, a major Chinese seller on Amazon, and Egreen Transport Corp, a U.S.-based warehouse operator. The dispute centers around unpaid storage fees, with Egreen alleging that Vevor owes $48 million. Tensions escalated to alarming levels, with accusations of vandalism, threats, and even solicitation of a contract killing against Egreen's owner.
Key Events Leading to the Conflict
The feud began in spring 2025 when Vevor's inventory, valued at $55 million, was locked in Egreen's warehouses across California, Georgia, and New Jersey due to unpaid fees. By July, the situation deteriorated further, with Egreen accusing Vevor of employing intimidation tactics, including impersonating police officers and making threats against its owner. Egreen's lawsuit, filed in October 2025, detailed these allegations and has since prompted criminal investigations by law enforcement in both California and Shanghai.
Allegations of Threats and Violence
Egreen's complaint claims that Vevor associates blocked warehouse entrances using U-Haul trucks and dispatched fake police vehicles. Reports indicate that Egreen's offices were vandalized, and threats were made against its owner and family, including ads on social media offering substantial sums for information and even for a contract killing. The alleged ads reportedly offered $200,000 for information and up to $5 million for the execution of the threats.
Responses from Vevor and Egreen
Vevor, through its parent company HK Sishun Trade Co., has denied all allegations, asserting that Egreen is not a reliable partner and suggesting that the lawsuit is an attempt to damage its reputation. Vevor claims that it has complied with a settlement agreement and has faced unwarranted interference from Egreen. In contrast, Egreen maintains that it has acted in good faith and has suffered reputational damage due to Vevor's actions.
Official Statements & Investigations
Amazon, which has been drawn into the conflict due to Vevor's status as a seller on its platform, has reportedly been informed of the situation but stated it is "unable to take action at this time." Meanwhile, law enforcement investigations are ongoing, with police in California and Shanghai collaborating on the case. Gerardo Medina, a former investigator with the Riverside County Sheriff’s Office, noted that evidence collected during a search of Vevor's U.S. headquarters has led to investigative leads in China.
Criticism & Opposition
Critics of Vevor have pointed to its history of product recalls and lawsuits related to defective tools sold on Amazon, raising concerns about the company's business practices. The allegations of violence and intimidation have further tarnished its reputation, prompting calls for accountability from both Egreen and consumer advocacy groups.
What's Next?
As investigations continue, the legal battle between Vevor and Egreen remains unresolved. Egreen's lawsuit was withdrawn but can be refiled, and both companies are likely to face scrutiny as the situation develops. The outcome of the criminal investigations may also influence the future of Vevor's operations in the U.S. market.
Verbatim Quotes
“enough money for a down payment on a home.” — Source with direct knowledge of the incident
“We take these claims with the utmost seriousness. The suggestion of any involvement in a ‘contract killing’ is not only false but deeply irresponsible. We deny all accusations in the strongest terms.” — Alan Engle, Attorney for Vevor
“reputational damage… despite acting in good faith, Egreen has been forced to bear the legal, public and operational consequences of a crisis caused by Vevor.” — Egreen Statement
“The murder for hire posting appears to have been committed in China,” — Gerardo Medina, Former Investigator, Riverside County Sheriff’s Office
