Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

New Jersey Man Sues CBD Kratom Over Alleged Addiction to Kratom Drinks

4/5/2026, 11:56:20 AM

Allegations of Addiction and Lawsuit Details

Evan Eichhorn, a 34-year-old man from Haddon Heights, New Jersey, has filed a proposed class action lawsuit against CBD Kratom and its parent company, MNG Brands, claiming that he became severely addicted to kratom drinks marketed as energy boosters. The lawsuit, filed on March 14, 2026, in a Pennsylvania Federal Court, alleges that the companies failed to adequately warn consumers about the addictive nature of their products. Eichhorn claims he spent over $60,000 on these drinks over two years, ultimately leading him to seek rehabilitation for his addiction.

The Nature of Kratom and Its Risks

Kratom, derived from the leaves of the Mitragyna speciosa tree, is legal in most states, including Pennsylvania and New Jersey, but lacks FDA approval. The FDA has issued multiple warnings regarding 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH), a key component of kratom that can produce euphoric effects similar to opioids. Eichhorn's lawsuit highlights the potential dangers of kratom, stating that he experienced a feeling of euphoria after his first sip of the drink, which led him to consume up to 16 cans daily.

Impact on Personal Life and Health

Eichhorn's addiction reportedly escalated to the point where he could not quit the substance independently. In March 2025, he entered rehab, where he was treated with suboxone, a medication used to manage opioid withdrawal symptoms. His experience underscores the potential health risks associated with kratom consumption, particularly when marketed without sufficient warnings about its addictive properties.

Official Statements & Responses

As of now, CBD Kratom and MNG Brands have not publicly responded to the lawsuit or the allegations made by Eichhorn. The lack of comment from the companies raises questions about their awareness of the risks associated with their products and their responsibility towards consumer safety.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics of kratom argue that its legal status and marketing as a safe alternative to traditional energy drinks can mislead consumers about its risks. The FDA's warnings about kratom's potential for addiction and adverse health effects further support concerns regarding its safety. Advocates for stricter regulations on kratom products emphasize the need for clearer labeling and consumer education to prevent similar cases of addiction.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

While Eichhorn's lawsuit presents a personal account of addiction, there is limited data on the prevalence of kratom addiction among users. The legal status of kratom varies by state, and ongoing debates about its safety and efficacy contribute to the complexity of the issue. Further research and regulatory scrutiny may be necessary to address the potential health risks associated with kratom consumption.

Verbatim Quotes

“Upon drinking his first beverage …Eichhorn experienced a feeling of euphoria,” — Evan Eichhorn, Plaintiff

“CBD Kratom and MNG Brands did not immediately respond to requests for comment.” — Source