Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Minnesota School Districts Challenge Immigration Enforcement Policy

4/9/2026, 4:19:54 AM

Legal Challenge to Immigration Enforcement Near Schools

Attorneys representing the Fridley and Duluth school districts, along with the Education Minnesota teachers union, have filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking to block a Trump administration policy that allows increased immigration enforcement actions in and around schools. This legal action comes in response to the Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) decision to rescind longstanding protections that previously restricted immigration enforcement in "sensitive locations," which include schools, churches, and hospitals. The lawsuit was initiated amid heightened enforcement activities under Operation Metro Surge, which saw approximately 3,000 federal officers deployed in Minnesota.

Impact on School Attendance and Resources

Superintendent Brenda Lewis of the Fridley district reported significant declines in student attendance, attributing this to fears stemming from the policy change. Since December, the district has lost 72 students, which has adversely affected funding tied to enrollment numbers. Lewis noted that many families opted for virtual learning or transferred to other districts perceived as safer, while some students have been detained. In January, attendance data indicated that over 9,000 students were absent from St. Paul schools, representing more than a quarter of the district's enrollment, while Minneapolis Public Schools reported nearly 30% absenteeism on a single day.

Arguments Presented in Court

During the court hearing, the plaintiffs argued that the policy change has directly harmed their ability to provide a safe learning environment. Lewis emphasized that the safety of students is paramount and that the federal immigration policy should not interfere with their right to education. Conversely, Justice Department attorney Jessica Lundberg contended that the previous policy did not entirely prevent enforcement actions in schools and that reinstating it would not significantly alter the current situation.

Official Responses and Perspectives

Fridley Superintendent Brenda Lewis expressed the need for legal intervention to ensure the safety of students, stating, "Our district needed a helper... the safety of our children was taken away." In contrast, a DHS spokesperson defended the policy change, asserting that it allows law enforcement to act against individuals who pose a threat to public safety. Tricia McLaughlin, former assistant secretary of DHS, stated, "Criminals are no longer able to hide in America's schools to avoid arrest."

Conflicting Reports and Future Implications

The court's decision on the lawsuit remains pending, with implications that could extend beyond Minnesota. The case raises critical questions about the balance between immigration enforcement and the rights of students to access education in a safe environment. As the legal proceedings unfold, the outcomes may influence similar policies across the nation, particularly in how schools manage the intersection of immigration enforcement and student safety.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Our district needed a helper. We needed to pursue how to keep our children safe. My job is not about federal immigration policy, it's not about ICE enforcement, but it is about children's safety and the safety of our children was taken away and their federal right to attend school in a safe learning environment was taken away,” — Brenda Lewis, Superintendent, Fridley Public Schools
  • “Criminals are no longer be able [sic] to hide in America's schools to avoid arrest.” — Tricia McLaughlin, Former Assistant Secretary of DHS