Full Breakdown
Pippa Middleton and James Matthews Face Local Backlash Over Footpath Closure
4/9/2026, 2:32:22 PM
Core Event: Closure of Mill Lane Sparks Controversy
Pippa Middleton and her husband, James Matthews, are embroiled in a planning dispute with local residents in Kintbury, Berkshire, after they closed Mill Lane, a historic footpath that has been used by villagers for decades. The couple, who purchased the Grade II-listed Barton Court estate in 2022 for £15.5 million, installed an electric gate and signage stating "Private: No Public Access" shortly after moving in. This closure has led to significant backlash from the community, who argue that the lane is a vital public right of way.
Background & Context: Historical Use of Mill Lane
Historically, Mill Lane provided access to the surrounding countryside and was regularly used by locals for walking. Under the previous owner, Sir Terence Conran, the path remained open to the public. However, following the Matthews' acquisition of the estate, access was restricted, prompting a formal objection from the couple against a designation by West Berkshire Council that recognized the lane as a public right of way.
Local Response: Community Outcry and Support
A group of 35 local residents, supported by the Ramblers Association, is advocating for the path to be legally recognized as a public right of way. They argue that the closure forces walkers onto a busy main road, posing safety risks. Eugene Futcher, chairman of the West Berkshire Ramblers, emphasized the importance of local paths for mental well-being, stating, "Taking it away will be inconvenient, especially when walking is so important to mental health."
Conversely, some residents express understanding for the Matthews' desire for privacy while raising their children. However, this sentiment is overshadowed by frustration over the perceived elitism of the couple, with one long-time resident remarking, "I don't think they give a damn about what anyone in the village thinks."
Official Statements & Responses
James Matthews has formally contested the public right of way designation, asserting that the claimed route does not meet legal requirements for a footpath and citing potential privacy and security issues for his family. His statement also noted that alternative walking routes exist in Kintbury, which he claims are more appealing than Mill Lane.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While the community and the Ramblers Association maintain that Mill Lane has been a public path for decades, Matthews' representatives argue that it has always been marked as private. This discrepancy highlights the ongoing debate over the lane's status and the differing perspectives on its historical use.
What's Next: Public Inquiry Scheduled
A public inquiry is set to begin on May 14, where the Planning Inspectorate will review the case and deliver a legally binding decision regarding the path's status. The outcome will have significant implications for both the Matthews family and the local community, as they navigate the balance between private property rights and public access to historical pathways.
