Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Inquiry into Gas Export Tax Settings Amid Rising Prices

4/13/2026, 10:54:18 PM

Overview of the Inquiry

The Australian Senate is set to conduct an inquiry into the export tax settings for major gas companies, including Santos, Woodside, Chevron, and Shell. This inquiry, led by the Greens, aims to scrutinize the practices of these corporations as calls for a new 25% export tax grow in response to soaring global fuel prices, exacerbated by the ongoing conflict involving the US and Israel against Iran. The inquiry will take place in Canberra and Perth later this month, with the chief executives of the involved companies requested to provide evidence.

Context and Background

The inquiry follows revelations that the Prime Minister's department had asked the Treasury to model the implications of a flat tax on gas exports, alongside potential adjustments to the petroleum resource rent tax (PRRT) and corporate income tax regulations. Proponents of the proposed 25% tax, including unions and social service organizations, argue that it could contribute approximately $17 billion to the federal budget. However, the Labor government is cautious, prioritizing the stability of fuel imports, particularly in light of the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz.

Key Figures Involved

The inquiry will feature testimonies from prominent figures in the gas industry, including Liz Westcott (Woodside), Balaji Krishnamurthy (Chevron), and Kevin Gallagher (Santos). Additionally, ambassadors from key energy partner nations such as Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Japan have been invited to provide insights.

Official Statements & Responses

Greens senator Steph Hodgins-May emphasized the need for transparency, stating, “The CEOs of these profiteering gas corporations need to front the inquiry and explain to the Australian people why they’re taking our gas and selling it offshore for record profits, while paying almost no tax.” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, when questioned about potential changes to gas tax settings, maintained a non-committal stance, indicating that the budget would be revealed next month.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics, including the Greens, argue that the current tax framework allows gas corporations to profit excessively while contributing minimally to the national budget. The Greens Institute has suggested that gas exporters could see profits exceeding $78 billion in 2026 due to the ongoing geopolitical tensions. They advocate for more stringent windfall profit taxes, proposing rates as high as 50% to align with practices in countries like Norway.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

While the inquiry aims to address the taxation of gas exports, there is a lack of consensus on the potential impacts of such changes. The International Energy Agency's director, Fatih Birol, cautioned against abrupt tax alterations, warning that they could deter energy investors. This highlights a tension between the need for fiscal reform and the imperative to maintain investor confidence in the Australian energy sector.

What's Next

The inquiry is scheduled to commence later this month, with the outcomes expected to influence the upcoming federal budget and the broader discourse on energy taxation in Australia. The government’s approach to balancing fiscal responsibility with energy security will be closely monitored as the situation develops.