Alec Bohm's Legal Battle with Parents Over Financial Mismanagement

Alec Bohm, a third baseman for the Philadelphia Phillies, is embroiled in a legal conflict with his parents, Daniel and Lisa Bohm, over allegations of financial mismanagement. Bohm's lawyers filed a preliminary injunction seeking the return of $528,618 that his parents allegedly withdrew from a brokerage account linked to Bohm's finances. The case, which has escalated since Bohm filed a lawsuit against his parents in March seeking $3 million in damages, centers on claims that his parents mismanaged his earnings through limited liability companies (LLCs) created to manage his baseball income.

New York Times

Bohm's lawsuit alleges that Daniel and Lisa Bohm misappropriated funds from the LLCs, using them for personal expenses while failing to disclose their financial activities to him. The injunction filing claims that the couple transferred the aforementioned funds to a trust held by their attorney, Robert Eckard, to cover their legal costs. Bohm's legal team argues that this action was taken with the intent to undermine his financial interests. The filing also details that Daniel and Lisa created at least four LLCs and misrepresented their ownership stakes, leading to significant financial discrepancies.

New York Times

In a signed affidavit, Bohm contends that his parents pressured him into hiring agent Scott Boras in 2020, claiming they did so to serve their interests rather than his. Bohm has since terminated his relationship with Boras and hired Nick Chanock from The Team (formerly Wasserman) as his new agent. Bohm's affidavit further alleges that his parents misrepresented the qualifications of his financial advisor and coerced him into decisions that were not in his best interest.

New York Times

A Philadelphia judge has granted Bohm's parents ten days to respond to the injunction request. Their attorney, Siobhan Cole, stated that the accusations against Daniel and Lisa are unfounded and that they have always acted in their son's best interests. The Bohms assert that they have maintained open communication regarding the management of the LLCs and that Bohm's financial assets remain intact.

New York Times

The Bohms' legal team argues that the existence of operating agreements for the LLCs justifies handling the dispute in arbitration court in Pinellas County, Florida. However, Bohm's legal team claims these agreements are fraudulent, asserting that he was misled about their terms. Bohm has expressed doubts about the authenticity of his signature on these documents, raising questions about their validity.

New York Times

The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for Bohm's financial future, particularly as he approaches free agency after the 2026 season. His legal team warns that without injunctive relief, Bohm stands to lose the contested funds, while his parents would face no repercussions for their alleged misconduct.

New York Times

• “Daniel and Lisa evidently sought to set aside a war chest to fund their litigation expenses, weeks before Alec commenced this lawsuit, knowing full well that they never intended to honor the terms of their arrangement as represented to Alec.” — Bohm's legal team

New York Times

• “Daniel and Lisa Bohm have done nothing but care for their son and protect his personal wealth and safety.” — Siobhan Cole, Attorney for Daniel and Lisa Bohm

New York Times

• “Indeed, unlike Alec who stands to suffer yet another loss in the amount of $528,618.00 as a direct result of Daniel’s and Lisa’s conduct,” — Bohm's legal team

New York Times

This ongoing legal dispute highlights the complexities of familial relationships intertwined with financial management, particularly in high-stakes professional sports.

New York Times