Full Breakdown
Controversy Surrounds Utah Valley University's Choice of Commencement Speaker
4/16/2026, 12:41:20 AM
Background of the Controversy
Utah Valley University (UVU) has selected author Sharon McMahon as the keynote speaker for its upcoming commencement ceremony. This decision has sparked significant backlash from segments of the student body, particularly following the recent assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk on the university's campus on September 10. McMahon's social media posts, made shortly after Kirk's death, criticized his rhetoric and the impact of his words on marginalized communities.
Core Event: McMahon's Selection and Student Backlash
In her posts, McMahon stated, “Millions of people feel they were harmed, and the murder that was horrific and should never have happened does not magically erase what was said or done.” She emphasized that for many, including Black, LGBTQ, and Muslim individuals, Kirk was not merely a participant in good-faith debates. This perspective has led to a divide among students at UVU, with conservative groups, including the university's chapter of Turning Point USA (TPUSA), expressing strong disapproval of her selection.
Caleb Chilcutt, president of the TPUSA chapter, described McMahon's choice as “a slap to the face,” asserting that the university could have chosen a different speaker who would not have been critical of Kirk so soon after his assassination. He articulated that many students are still grieving and that McMahon's comments were “tone-deaf and disrespectful.”
Official Statements & Responses
UVU President Astrid S. Tuminez defended the choice of McMahon, stating, “Sharon McMahon is an original. She is a force of nature and a force for good.” Tuminez highlighted McMahon's background as a former history teacher and her ability to inspire students through education. She noted that McMahon's work emphasizes the power of individuals to contribute to a vibrant democracy.
Criticism from Political Figures
The backlash has also drawn the attention of political figures. Former Utah Congressman Jason Chaffetz criticized the university's decision, labeling McMahon a “liberal hack” and suggesting that the university should consider alternative speakers, such as astronauts or athletes, to inspire graduates. Chaffetz described McMahon's selection as “insensitive, untimely, and unnecessary,” arguing that it does not align with the celebratory nature of a commencement ceremony.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
While conservative students have voiced their discontent, some liberal students at UVU have expressed support for McMahon, indicating a split in opinion regarding her selection. This division reflects broader societal tensions surrounding political discourse and the legacy of Charlie Kirk.
Verbatim Quotes
- “Millions of people feel they were harmed, and the murder that was horrific and should never have happened does not magically erase what was said or done.” — Sharon McMahon, Author
- “But the fact they brought someone who was so critical, literally days after the assassination on my campus, is just shameful for me.” — Caleb Chilcutt, TPUSA Chapter President
- “It’s a horrific choice. It’s insensitive, untimely, and unnecessary,” — Jason Chaffetz, Former Utah Congressman
The controversy surrounding Sharon McMahon's selection as UVU's commencement speaker highlights the complexities of navigating political sensitivities in academic settings, especially in the wake of tragic events.
