California's Senate Bill 79: Local Governments Navigate New Housing Law

Senate Bill 79, which takes effect on July 1, 2026, allows developers to construct mid-rise apartment buildings near major transit stops in California. The law mandates that cities must adapt their zoning regulations to accommodate increased housing density, particularly in urban areas. However, the final version of the bill provides local governments with significant flexibility regarding the implementation of these changes.

Calmatters

Cities across California, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Oakland, are exploring various strategies to comply with SB 79. Los Angeles has opted for a delay, voting to overhaul its zoning map to buy additional time until 2030. This approach allows the city to temporarily exempt certain neighborhoods, particularly lower-income areas and those at risk of environmental hazards, from immediate compliance with the new density requirements.

Calmatters

Councilmember Katy Yaroslavsky of Los Angeles expressed that this delay provides the city with the opportunity to devise a more tailored housing plan while still increasing housing capacity in the short term. Conversely, pro-development advocates, such as Scott Epstein from Abundant Housing Los Angeles, have criticized this delay, arguing it may hinder the production of necessary housing.

Calmatters

San Francisco is pursuing a different approach, aiming to implement its own version of the law before the July deadline. The city plans to exempt certain industrial areas and low-resource neighborhoods while increasing allowable density in specific locations to meet state requirements.

Calmatters

In Oakland, the debate over compliance with SB 79 has revealed differing opinions among city council members. Some, like Zac Unger, advocate for immediate adoption of the state law, arguing that delaying compliance only creates a false sense of security. Others, representing low-resource neighborhoods, prefer to utilize the law's provisions for delay to develop a comprehensive local plan.

Calmatters

William Gilchrist, Oakland's Planning Director, emphasized that the discussion is not about opposing the law but rather about determining the timing and method of implementation. This sentiment reflects a broader trend among cities grappling with the balance between state mandates and local needs.

Calmatters

California Governor Gavin Newsom has publicly criticized cities like Los Angeles and San Diego for their attempts to shield certain areas from the law's requirements, although he has not accused them of outright violations. Meanwhile, Jason Rhine, a lobbyist with the League of California Cities, has called for an extension of the July 1 deadline, citing confusion among local planners regarding the law's specifics.

Calmatters

While some cities are actively seeking to delay or modify their compliance with SB 79, others, like Sacramento, are opting to maintain the state-set zoning rules with minimal adjustments. This divergence raises questions about the overall effectiveness of the law and the potential for widespread resistance once the deadline passes.

Calmatters

As the July 1 deadline approaches, cities will need to finalize their plans to either comply with SB 79 or risk facing state-imposed zoning regulations. The outcomes of these local decisions will significantly impact California's housing landscape and the effectiveness of the state's efforts to address housing shortages.

Calmatters