Voting Rights Groups Challenge DOJ's Data Collection Efforts

On April 21, 2026, a coalition of voting rights organizations, including the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), and Protect Democracy, filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ). The lawsuit seeks to prevent the Trump administration from collecting and utilizing state voter rolls, which the plaintiffs argue could lead to the wrongful purging of eligible voters ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. The plaintiffs contend that the DOJ's actions represent an unconstitutional overreach into state election administration.

Voting Rights Groups Sue DOJ to Block National Voter Surveil-and-Purge DatabaseUsNews and World ReportVoting rights groups sue Trump administration over Department of Justice voter roll requests

The lawsuit claims that the DOJ is attempting to create a national voter database by demanding confidential voter information from all 50 states and Washington, D.C. This includes sensitive data such as partial Social Security numbers. The plaintiffs assert that at least 12 states, including Texas and Nebraska, have complied with these demands, thereby risking voter privacy and security. The complaint argues that the DOJ's efforts are not about election security but rather a strategy to disenfranchise voters, particularly those who lean Democratic.

Voting Rights Groups Sue DOJ to Block National Voter Surveil-and-Purge DatabaseVoting rights groups sue Trump administration over Department of Justice voter roll requestsUsNews and World Report

The plaintiffs argue that the DOJ's actions violate the U.S. Constitution, which grants states the authority to manage their own elections. They assert that the DOJ's plans to use flawed verification methods could result in "false positives," leading to the wrongful removal of eligible voters from the rolls. The lawsuit requests that a federal judge in Washington, D.C., halt the DOJ's data collection efforts and order the deletion of any data already obtained.

UsNews and World Report

Virginia Kase Solomón, President and CEO of Common Cause, stated, “This is a blatant, partisan power grab designed to cast doubt on the validity of our elections.” Ming Cheung, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU, emphasized that the DOJ should protect voting rights rather than exploit its position to gather sensitive data. Nikhel Sus, Chief Counsel at CREW, remarked, “This effort to consolidate millions of Americans’ confidential voter data in a master federal database is part of a larger illegal scheme to take over states’ constitutional roles.”

Voting Rights Groups Sue DOJ to Block National Voter Surveil-and-Purge Database

Critics of the lawsuit argue that the DOJ's actions are necessary for maintaining the integrity of voter rolls and ensuring that ineligible voters are removed. Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon noted that the DOJ has identified numerous deceased individuals and those lacking proof of citizenship on voter rolls. However, she did not provide evidence that these individuals had cast votes.

UsNews and World Report

While the DOJ has sued 30 states for refusing to comply with its data requests, federal judges in five states have dismissed these lawsuits, citing insufficient justification for the DOJ's demands. This raises questions about the legal authority of the DOJ in enforcing voter list maintenance and the potential implications for state autonomy in election administration.

Voting rights groups sue Trump administration over Department of Justice voter roll requests

The outcome of this lawsuit could significantly impact the administration of elections in the U.S., particularly regarding the balance of power between federal and state authorities in managing voter rolls. The case is expected to be closely monitored as it progresses through the courts, with potential ramifications for the upcoming midterm elections.

Voting rights groups sue Trump administration over Department of Justice voter roll requests