Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Cleveland Browns Navigate Myles Garrett's Contract Modifications and Trade Speculation

4/23/2026, 1:06:35 AM

Contract Adjustments and Implications

In March 2023, the Cleveland Browns made significant modifications to Myles Garrett's contract, extending the deadline for picking up options in 2026, 2027, and 2028 from March 25 to September 2 of each respective year. This change allows the Browns to delay substantial payments associated with these options, which include a $10 million payment due within 30 days of exercising the option. The restructuring also introduced two additional dummy/voiding years in 2034 and 2035, with substantial option bonuses that affect Garrett's base salary in 2029 and 2030.

These adjustments have altered Garrett's salary cap implications, reducing the immediate dead money associated with a potential trade. Previously, trading Garrett before June 1 would have resulted in a prohibitive dead cap charge of over $69 million. Now, the dead money would decrease to approximately $40 million, making a trade more feasible.

Trade Speculation and Team Dynamics

The contract modifications have fueled speculation regarding Garrett's future with the Browns. His absence from voluntary offseason workouts, including a recent minicamp, has raised eyebrows, particularly given the new coaching staff led by head coach Todd Monken. Monken has not yet met Garrett in person, which adds to the uncertainty surrounding their relationship. General Manager Andrew Berry has publicly stated that Garrett is a "career Brown" and dismissed trade rumors, asserting that the contract adjustments were not indicative of an impending trade.

Despite this, insiders suggest that Garrett's absence and the financial maneuvers signal a potential shift in the team's direction. The Browns' decision to restructure Garrett's contract has been interpreted by some as preparation for a trade, especially if they target a pass rusher in the upcoming NFL Draft.

Performance and Future Considerations

Garrett, who set the NFL single-season sack record with 23 sacks in 2025 and won his second Defensive Player of the Year award, remains a pivotal figure for the Browns. However, the team's struggles in recent seasons, including a disappointing five-win campaign in 2025, have led to discussions about whether trading Garrett could facilitate a rebuild. The Browns' lack of a franchise quarterback and the looming dead money associated with quarterback Deshaun Watson further complicate their financial landscape.

As the offseason progresses, Garrett's situation will continue to be scrutinized. His potential demand for a contract adjustment, following the recent lucrative deals signed by other players in his position, adds another layer of complexity. The Browns' upcoming mandatory minicamp on June 9 will be a critical juncture, as it will be the first opportunity for Garrett to engage directly with the new coaching staff.

Official Statements and Responses

Browns officials, including Andrew Berry and Todd Monken, have attempted to downplay concerns regarding Garrett's absence. Berry emphasized that the relationship with Garrett is strong and that he remains a key part of the team's future. Monken echoed this sentiment, stating, "This is voluntary... We expect them to be ready."

Conflicting Reports and Gaps

While the Browns maintain that Garrett is not on the trading block, the financial adjustments and his absence from team activities have led to conflicting interpretations among analysts and insiders. Some view the contract changes as a strategic move for a potential trade, while others believe it reflects the team's commitment to retaining their star player.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Myles is a career Brown,” — Andrew Berry, General Manager
  • “We expect them to be ready.” — Todd Monken, Head Coach
  • “There is merit to trading Garrett as soon as possible.” — Analyst Commentary

As the offseason unfolds, the dynamics surrounding Myles Garrett will be closely monitored, with the potential for significant implications for both the player and the Cleveland Browns.