Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

California Lawmakers Propose Changes to Elderly Parole for Sex Offenders

4/23/2026, 2:08:25 AM

Legislative Response to High-Profile Parole Cases

California lawmakers are responding to the potential release of two convicted sex offenders, David Allen Funston and Gregory Lee Vogelsang, by proposing significant changes to the state's elderly parole laws. Both men, convicted of multiple sexual assaults against children in the Sacramento region, were found suitable for parole in 2025 under existing statutes that allow felons serving life sentences to be eligible for parole at age 50 after serving 20 years. In light of these cases, Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen, representing Elk Grove, has introduced legislation to raise the earliest parole eligibility age for sex offenders with life sentences to 65.

Key Legislative Proposals

Nguyen's bill aims to address public safety concerns by mandating psychological evaluations for sex offenders with life sentences through the Department of State Hospitals, which can indefinitely commit individuals deemed “sexually violent predators.” Currently, such evaluations only apply to sex offenders not serving life sentences. Nguyen emphasized the severity of the crimes committed by Funston and Vogelsang, stating, “I don’t know that you can necessarily change yourself from wanting or stopping yourself from molesting little children.” The bill has garnered bipartisan support, passing an Assembly Public Safety Committee vote with an 8-0 margin.

Public and Political Reactions

Critics of the current parole system, including Republican Assemblymember Tom Lackey, have voiced strong opposition to the release of Funston and Vogelsang. Lackey described the existing law as “a travesty to justice” and called for the removal of any parole board members who voted for their release. Despite these concerns, data indicates that individuals released through the parole board have a low recidivism rate, with less than 3% committing new crimes.

Conflicting Perspectives on Rehabilitation

While some lawmakers advocate for stricter parole rules, others, including civil rights and prisoner advocacy groups, argue that such changes could undermine effective parole laws that have contributed to reducing California’s prison population. Keith Wattley, founder of the nonprofit UnCommon Law, highlighted that no individual released under elderly parole has committed a new sex offense, suggesting that the current system effectively serves public safety.

Official Statements and Legal Considerations

Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed concern regarding the potential release of Funston and Vogelsang, requesting further reviews of their parole hearings. Funston's parole was upheld by an en banc ruling, while Vogelsang's case is under further review. Former Board of Parole Hearings executive officer Jennifer Shaffer noted that the board must release individuals who do not pose a current, unreasonable risk to public safety, emphasizing the importance of structured decision-making in parole evaluations.

What's Next?

As the legislative process unfolds, the implications of Nguyen's proposed changes to elderly parole laws will continue to be debated. The outcome may significantly impact the future of parole for sex offenders in California, balancing public safety concerns with the principles of rehabilitation and justice.