The Financial Burden of U.S. Military Operations in Latin America

A recent analysis by Brown University’s Costs of War Project reveals that U.S. military interventions in Venezuela and operations against boats in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific have incurred costs of at least $4.7 billion from August 1, 2025, to March 31, 2026. This figure encompasses expenses related to Operations Absolute Resolve and Southern Spear, which include air, naval, and Special Operations costs. The analysis suggests that this estimate is likely conservative, as the Pentagon has not disclosed comprehensive financial details regarding these operations.

The Intercept

The largest portion of the expenditures, approximately $3.8 billion, is attributed to naval deployments, specifically the Iwo Jima Amphibious Ready Group, which includes the USS Iwo Jima, USS Fort Lauderdale, and USS San Antonio. The daily operational costs for these ships are estimated at $9 million. Additionally, around $616 million has been spent on aircraft deployments, including P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft and F-35A Lightning II fighters. The costs associated with munitions used in recent strikes on boats range from $12.5 million to $50 million, reflecting the lack of transparency surrounding these operations.

The Intercept

The U.S. military's involvement in Latin America is framed within the context of the "Trump Corollary" to the Monroe Doctrine, which aims to assert American influence in the region. This strategy has led to military actions in Ecuador against transnational criminal organizations, with U.S. support. The White House has reported military actions taken against narco-terrorists, indicating a broader scope of U.S. military engagement in the region.

The Intercept

Critics argue that the substantial financial resources allocated to military operations could be better utilized for addressing economic needs in the region. Jennifer Kavanagh, a director at Defense Priorities, emphasized that the U.S. is not demonstrably safer or more prosperous due to these military actions. Furthermore, Hanna Homestead, a research analyst, highlighted the ethical implications of prioritizing military spending over essential services like healthcare, stating, “Across the country people are going bankrupt and dying prematurely because of lack of health care, but the U.S. government has billions to spend on imperialist violence.”

The Intercept

The Pentagon has refrained from providing detailed insights into the costs associated with these operations, with U.S. Southern Command stating that it cannot disclose budgetary information. Experts predict that the financial burden of these military engagements will continue to grow, potentially leading to long-term costs that could affect future generations. Kavanagh noted that the military presence in the Caribbean is expected to remain until at least late 2028, suggesting that the financial implications of these operations will persist.

The Intercept

• “American taxpayers, who are increasingly unable to afford basic needs, have a right to know how their tax dollars are spent,” — Hanna Homestead, Research Analyst

The Intercept

• “ “Though the Trump administration is right to focus more on the Western Hemisphere, most needs in the region are economic or require investment in regional law enforcement.” — Jennifer Kavanagh, Director of Military Analysis

The Intercept

• “This situation illustrates why greater restraint on Pentagon spending — which primarily benefits private contractors — is so necessary.” — Hanna Homestead, Research Analyst

The Intercept

The ongoing military operations in Latin America not only represent a significant financial burden but also raise questions about the prioritization of military engagement over domestic welfare.

The Intercept