The Dismantling of USAID: Consequences and Calls for Restoration

The dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has resulted in significant humanitarian consequences, with over 750,000 lives lost, predominantly among children. This action, attributed to the Trump administration and supported by figures like Elon Musk, is viewed as one of the most detrimental decisions in recent U.S. history. Critics argue that the agency's destruction stemmed from a lack of understanding and indifference among its dismantlers, rather than any inherent flaws within USAID itself.

Slate

USAID has historically been a cornerstone of American foreign aid, operating for over six decades with bipartisan support. The agency has been credited with saving 92 million lives globally in the past two decades, while also enhancing U.S. national security by fostering international partnerships and early disease detection systems. Secretary of State Marco Rubio emphasized USAID's importance in countering global threats, particularly from the Chinese Communist Party, highlighting its role in providing life-saving health interventions.

Slate

Critics of the dismantling, including former officials and health experts, argue that the decision was based on misinformation and a lack of appreciation for USAID's contributions. For instance, a Trump administration official mistakenly believed that USAID's global health initiatives were limited to abortion services. Furthermore, Susie Wiles, Trump’s chief of staff, acknowledged the lack of justification for dismantling the agency, stating her initial shock at the decision.

Slate

As the midterm elections approach, there is a growing consensus among political candidates that rebuilding USAID should be a priority. Advocates argue that any candidate aspiring for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2028 must commit to a plan for restoring the agency. The symbolic significance of USAID as a representation of American values abroad is underscored by former President Barack Obama’s assertion that “to many people around the world, USAID is the United States.”

Slate

The integration of USAID's functions into the State Department has raised concerns about the effectiveness of U.S. development assistance. Critics argue that this merger undermines the distinct roles of diplomacy and development, leading to a transactional approach that may compromise long-term partnerships. The new strategy has already resulted in conditions being placed on health aid, such as requiring access to critical resources in exchange for support, which deviates from the foundational principles of international development.

Slate

Restoring USAID is seen as a challenging but necessary endeavor. Advocates propose that Congress must reestablish the agency with a renewed mandate, emphasizing the need for improved operational structures and procurement processes. The potential for a reformed USAID to address contemporary global challenges is significant, with suggestions for transitioning aid ownership to host governments and enhancing flexibility in funding allocations.

Slate

• “To many people around the world, USAID is the United States.” — Barack Obama, Former President

Slate

• “ Regarding USAID’s global health programs, Rubio said: “Travel to the African continent, and you will meet people who are alive today because of the American-taxpayer-funded antiviral HIV medications that kept them alive.” — Marco Rubio, Secretary of State

Slate

The future of USAID remains uncertain, but the call for its restoration reflects a broader recognition of the agency's vital role in global health and development.

Slate