Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Historic First: Women Sit for Israel’s Chief Rabbinate Exam Amid Legal Battle

4/28/2026, 6:51:17 AM

Background & Legal Context

In July 2023 the Israeli High Court of Justice ordered the Chief Rabbinate to admit women to its state-backed certification exams, citing gender-equality law and rejecting the Rabbinate’s argument that, because it does not ordain women, it could exclude them from the exams.

Timeline

  • July 2023 – Court mandates women’s inclusion; Rabbinate’s request for a new hearing denied.
  • Feb 2024 – Six women register for spring exams.
  • Monday, Apr 2024 – Exam set for 10:30 a.m.; women sent to Ministry.
  • 2:45 p.m. – Court deadline forces exam sheets; women begin test.

Core Event

At 2:55 p.m. three women received exam sheets and completed a four-hour test on the laws of mourning in a Ministry hall; the Rabbinate cited “technical problems,” had no staff present, and used telephone support from Chief Rabbi Kalman Ber.

Key Figures & Groups

ITIM (Director Rabbi Seth Farber), Rabbanit Sarah Segal-Katz, Chief Rabbi Kalman Ber, the Rabbinate spokesperson, MK Moshe Gafni (UTJ) and MK Yair Golan (Democrats).

Data & Statistics

Six women registered; three sat the exam. Six tests grant a “neighborhood rabbi” title, eleven a “city rabbi,” which affect public-sector salaries and eligibility for religious-service posts.

Official Statements & Responses

The Rabbinate spokesperson called the delay a “technical problem” and said a staff member would normally be present, but the separate venue prevented exam disruption. The High Court gave a 3 p.m. deadline. The Rabbinate announced a review committee; Supreme Court President Isaac Amit denied a new hearing.

Criticism & Opposition

ITIM labeled the delay “bureaucratic obstruction.” Segal-Katz said separate rooms breach equality. Gafni warned that obeying the court order conflicts with Halacha, calling it forbidden. Golan called any violation criminal.

On-the-Ground Reports

The women waited four hours in a Ministry office without food, while men took the exam elsewhere without interruption.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Sources differ on the start time (10 a.m. vs. 10:30 a.m.) and whether a staff member was present; the Rabbinate’s “technical problems” remain unexplained.

Why It Matters

The case tests gender-equality enforcement in Israel’s religious-state system and underscores how certification influences eligibility for religious-service posts, salary scales, and public-sector employment.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Our idea is that ‘separate but equal’ is not really equal, and the court agreed,” — Sarah Segal-Katz, Rabbanit
  • “They’ve been just sitting there, disgraced for two-and-a-half hours,” — Rabbi Seth Farber, ITIM Director
  • “I am one of the original petitioners, and I felt it was not okay to cooperate with these conditions.” — Sarah Segal-Katz
  • “This was one step in a much broader process, and I’m happy to be a part of it, when it means that more women have access to this knowledge.” — Ruth Agiv, exam candidate

What’s Next

The review committee will examine criteria; ITIM says it will pursue further court action if compliance lapses recur. The committee’s work may lead to reforms of exam administration.