Story perspectives

Supreme Court Strikes Down Louisiana Map, Calls VRA Demolition

4/30/2026

Left

Supreme Court Strikes

A lawsuit filed by white voters—some unaware they were named—triggered the Supreme Court case.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, struck down Louisiana’s congressional map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Justice Elena Kagan warned the decision dilutes Black voters’ power, calling it VRA demolition.
Governor Gavin Newsom said ruling guts Voting Rights Act and vowed California will protect democracy.

Right

Supreme Court Invalidates

Chief Justice John Roberts described Louisiana’s congressional district as a 200-mile “snake” spanning Shreveport, Alexandria, Lafayette and Baton Rouge.
Supreme Court invalidated Louisiana’s congressional map, a 6-3 ruling citing reliance on race and narrowing Section 2 of Voting Rights Act.
Justice Samuel Alito said Section 2 applies only to intentional discrimination, a high bar.
Groups warn ruling could let GOP redraw 19 districts; DeSantis’ map adds four Republican seats.

Center

Alito Strikes

Justice Samuel Alito wrote the majority opinion, holding Section 2 compliance cannot justify the state’s use of race in drawing districts.
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s second majority-Black congressional district on April 29, 2026, deeming it an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Justice Elena Kagan dissented, joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, firmly.
The dissent described the ruling as a demolition of the Voting Rights Act, clearly.

Blindspot

Center coverage highlighted the decision’s timing before the 2026 midterm primaries and its potential to reshape congressional seat calculations, a consequence not emphasized in Left coverage.
Center coverage emphasized Justice Alito’s majority opinion that Section 2 compliance cannot justify racial districting, a detail largely absent from Right coverage.

History

Historical Context

After the 1990 census, the Supreme Court struck down North Carolina’s 12th congressional district in Shaw v. Reno (1993), issuing a 5-4 opinion authored by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor that applied strict scrutiny to race-based maps. The ruling spawned later challenges such as Cooper v. Harris (2016) and continues to shape litigation over racially drawn districts across the South.

1 of 5

Supreme Court Strikes

A lawsuit filed by white voters—some unaware they were named—triggered the Supreme Court case.
The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, struck down Louisiana’s congressional map as an unconstitutional racial gerrymander.
Justice Elena Kagan warned the decision dilutes Black voters’ power, calling it VRA demolition.
Governor Gavin Newsom said ruling guts Voting Rights Act and vowed California will protect democracy.

1 / 5