Back to today’s briefing

Story perspectives

Supreme Court Strikes Section 2, Endangering Minority Voting Rights

4/30/2026

31 7 Full Breakdown

Summary

Story summary

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, eliminated Section 2 protections of the Voting Rights Act.
Legal scholars argue that only sweeping Supreme Court reforms can protect the Voting Rights Act, noting the Court can strike down any new law.
Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent warned the ruling overturns congressional authority and threatens fair representation for Black and brown voters.

History

Historical Context

In August 1965 President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act, ending Jim Crow voting barriers; the Senate approved it 88-0 and about 250,000 Black voters registered that year. The 6-3 2026 Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais, written by Justice Clarence Thomas, continues the post-Shelby (2013) erosion of Section 2, tightening limits on federal oversight of Black voters.

1 of 2

Story summary

The U.S. Supreme Court, in a 6-3 ruling in Louisiana v. Callais, eliminated Section 2 protections of the Voting Rights Act.
Legal scholars argue that only sweeping Supreme Court reforms can protect the Voting Rights Act, noting the Court can strike down any new law.
Justice Elena Kagan’s dissent warned the ruling overturns congressional authority and threatens fair representation for Black and brown voters.

1 / 2