Oregon Court Orders Gender-Identity-Based Housing for Transgender Women Inmates

U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke ordered the Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC) to house transgender women in facilities matching their gender identity, presuming such placement unless an individualized safety assessment indicates otherwise. Clarke noted that about 90 % of transgender women in Oregon prisons have historically been placed in men’s facilities.

The Advocate

Shortly after President Donald Trump began his second term, his administration issued an executive order directing that transgender women be housed in men’s prisons, rolling back Prison Rape Elimination Act protections. In the same month, a D.C. appellate court ruled the Federal Bureau of Prisons could relocate transgender women inmates into men’s facilities, a decision the Justice Department framed as upholding the administration’s policy.

The Advocate

• Shortly after the start of President Donald Trump’s second term, the administration issued an executive order mandating housing based on sex assigned at birth.

The Advocate

• In the same month, a D.C. appellate court permitted relocation of transgender women to men’s prisons.

The Advocate

• Judge Mark D. Clarke issued a preliminary injunction ordering gender-identity-based housing in Oregon.

The Advocate

• Oregon settled with transgender inmate Zola Zombie for $295,000 after findings of repeated harm.

The Advocate

State data indicate about 90 % of transgender women in Oregon prisons have been placed in men’s facilities, a practice the judge linked to higher risk of violence and sexual assault. The state also settled with transgender inmate Zola Zombie for $295,000 after findings of repeated harm.

The Advocate

Judge Clarke’s order emphasized a presumption of gender-identity-based placement, requiring individualized reviews only when safety concerns arise. Justice Department spokesperson Emily Covington said the appellate decision reflected common sense and biology, reaffirming support for the executive order.

The Advocate

The Justice Department’s view that the appellate decision aligns with common sense and biology underscores federal opposition to the Oregon injunction and highlights the broader clash between the Trump administration and state efforts to protect transgender inmates.

The Advocate

Federal appellate rulings permit placement of transgender women in men’s prisons, while Oregon’s injunction mandates the opposite. The sources lack data on outcomes of individualized assessments or on assault incident frequency in Oregon facilities.

The Advocate

• “It is undisputed in the record before the Court that this default presumption, and their overwhelming placement in men’s prisons, has exposed transgender women inmates to a high risk of violence and sexual assault,” — Judge Mark D. Clarke

The Advocate

• “The undisputed facts additionally show that ODOC has systemically failed to appropriately address this exposure.” — Judge Mark D. Clarke

The Advocate

• “Today’s decision is a win for common sense and biology,” — Emily Covington, Justice Department spokesperson

The Advocate

The divergent rulings create a legal collision that could prompt further appeals and judicial clarification of how federal executive orders intersect with state correctional policies for transgender inmates.

The Advocate