Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Podcaster Suggests Trump’s New Ballroom Conceals Underground Bunker for Potential Coup

5/5/2026, 4:07:01 AM

Alleged Coup Plot Linked to Trump’s Ballroom

During a Sunday episode of MeidasTouch’s *The Weekend Show*, liberal podcaster Anthony Davis asserted that President Donald Trump is constructing a “secret underground bunker” beneath a newly announced ballroom. Davis described the addition of “an additional 100,000 square feet” as a means for Trump to “hunker down” and potentially refuse to leave the White House after the next election. He framed the claim as a serious national-security concern, asking listeners whether a coup might be imminent.

Context of the Ballroom Project and Recent Political Climate

Davis referenced Trump’s 2024 victory speech in which the former president reportedly said he “shouldn’t have left” the White House. He linked the alleged bunker to broader public anxiety over rising gas prices, the ongoing conflict described as the “Iran war,” and a recent Supreme Court decision that declared race-based gerrymandering a violation of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. According to Davis, these factors have created a “panic” that fuels his speculation about a covert military installation beneath the ballroom.

Key Participants in the Discussion

  • Anthony Davis – Liberal podcaster and host of the episode, known for commentary on progressive platforms.
  • Kristen Clarke – Guest on the show, former assistant attorney general for the Civil Rights Division under President Joe Biden.
  • MeidasTouch – Progressive media outlet that produces *The Weekend Show* and disseminated the episode via YouTube.

Official Summaries of Statements

Davis presented the ballroom as a “giant ballroom that will clearly never be used for balls,” alleging that it includes a hidden military facility designed to enable Trump to “squat” in the White House and bypass constitutional limits on executive power. He also argued that Trump has previously disregarded the constitutional requirement for congressional approval before engaging in war.

Clarke responded by emphasizing constitutional constraints on presidential tenure, stating that “the Constitution makes clear that his time is coming to an end.” She expressed hope that the courts would enforce the relevant constitutional provisions, thereby preventing any attempt by Trump to remain in power through unconventional means.

Criticism and Counterpoints

The episode framed Davis’s assertions as a “bizarre theory,” indicating that the claims lack corroborating evidence within the public record. Clarke’s remarks focused on legal mechanisms rather than the specific architectural details of the ballroom, suggesting a disconnect between the alleged physical infrastructure and the constitutional arguments she advanced. No official government source confirmed the existence of an underground bunker or any related security plan.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “There is a fear that he ain’t leaving and that is something to be taken very seriously,” — Anthony Davis, podcaster
  • “He’s building an additional 100,000 square feet to hunker down this time with a military installation below this giant ballroom that will clearly never be used for balls,” — Anthony Davis
  • “Do you worry, as some of us do, that there is a coup on the way?” — Anthony Davis
  • “But the constitution also says that he can’t go to war without Congressional approval, and he walked all over that one,” — Anthony Davis
  • “The Constitution makes clear that his time is coming to an end,” — Kristen Clarke, former assistant attorney general
  • “And I hope that the courts will hold on this very simple provision of the Constitution that makes clear that he’s gotta go.” — Kristen Clarke

What’s Next

The discussion remains confined to the *The Weekend Show* broadcast and its YouTube posting. No formal inquiry or official response from the White House or federal agencies has been reported in the source material. Future coverage may focus on whether any investigative bodies examine the alleged construction plans or address the broader constitutional concerns raised by the participants.