Story perspectives

Supreme Court Dismantles Louisiana Black District, Weakens VRA

5/7/2026

Summary

Story summary

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling struck down a Louisiana majority-Black congressional district, weakening Section 2 of Voting Rights Act.
Justice John Roberts told a judicial conference in Hershey, Pennsylvania, that the Court is not a political actor.
Roberts warned that personal attacks on judges and overturning of precedent could harm the judiciary.
President Donald Trump criticized the Court’s handling of the case, leading Republican-led states to review redistricting plans.

History

Historical Context

In 1993, the Supreme Court’s *Shaw v. Reno* decision upheld Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, mandating race-neutral district maps. The 5-4 ruling, written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, required Louisiana to draw majority-Black districts where Black residents formed at least 30 % of the electorate. The 6-3 decision overturning Louisiana’s Black district echoes *Shaw v. Reno*, as Justice John Roberts and President Donald Trump denounce the Court’s shift on Section 2. The parallel suggests renewed battles over voting equity, prompting Republican-led states to reassess redistricting plans while civil-rights groups brace for further legal challenges.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Supreme Court’s 6-3 ruling struck down a Louisiana majority-Black congressional district, weakening Section 2 of Voting Rights Act.
Justice John Roberts told a judicial conference in Hershey, Pennsylvania, that the Court is not a political actor.
Roberts warned that personal attacks on judges and overturning of precedent could harm the judiciary.
President Donald Trump criticized the Court’s handling of the case, leading Republican-led states to review redistricting plans.

1 / 2