Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Hawaii Enacts Landmark Law to Strip Corporations of Political Spending Power

5/15/2026, 8:23:59 AM

Legislative Action Redefining Corporate Authority

On July 1 2027, a Hawaii statute (S.B. 2471) will take effect that redefines corporate powers, removing the authority for corporations, LLCs, partnerships and similar entities to spend money on any election. The measure is slated to take effect July 1 2027 and awaits Governor Josh Green’s signature.

Background & Context

Citizens United v. FEC (2010) ruled that corporations enjoy First-Amendment protection, overturning limits on corporate election spending. Since then, outside political spending topped $4 billion in 2024 federal races, with $1.9 billion classified as dark-money and corporate contributions rising from $359 million (2012) to $1.4 billion (latest cycle).

Key Figures & Groups

Governor Josh Green (D) must decide on signing; Attorney General Anne Lopez (D) warns of constitutional challenges; State Senator Jarrett Keohokalole and Senator Karl Rhoads sponsored the bill; Tom Moore and Neera Tanden (Center for American Progress) drafted the strategy; Ilya Shapiro (Manhattan Institute) opposes it; Jill Fisch (University of Pennsylvania) comments on its novelty.

Data & Statistics

The law bars for-profit firms, dark-money nonprofits, unions, chambers and out-of-state entities from election spending. 2024 outside spending hit $4 billion; dark-money $1.9 billion; corporate contributions rose from $359 million (2012) to $1.4 billion (latest). Effective July 1 2027.

Official Statements & Responses

Press secretary Erika Engle said Governor Green will announce his decision “at the appropriate time,” noting the law’s precedent-setting nature. Attorney General Lopez warned of costly defense and likely court defeat. Tom Moore called it a “brave and bold step,” and Neera Tanden called the measure historic.

Criticism & Opposition

Corporate-finance lawyers and conservative scholars say the bill breaches the First Amendment as set by *Citizens United*. Ilya Shapiro warned, “this isn’t a semantic game,” asserting partnership speech rights. Attorney General Lopez called the change an attempt to strip corporate speech. A Republican House member agreed the legal fight would be futile.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Reports differ on whether Governor Green has signed the bill. The Associated Press and BlackStar News say he signed it; The Atlantic notes the measure remains pending and may not be signed. No official confirmation is available.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Hawaii is taking a brave and bold step to get corporate and dark money out of America’s politics,” — Tom Moore, Senior Fellow, Center for American Progress
  • “It will send a powerful message that will be heard loud and clear across the Pacific and across the mainland.” — Tom Moore
  • “This isn’t a semantic game. Partnerships and loose organizations, all of them have the same rights,” — Ilya Shapiro, Director of Constitutional Studies, Manhattan Institute
  • “In response, Neera Tanden, president and CEO of the Center for American Progress, issued the following statement: Hawaii made history today in the fight against corporate and dark money that has sullied American politics for the past 16 years.” — Neera Tanden, President & CEO, Center for American Progress

What’s Next

The law’s fate rests on Governor Green’s signature and will likely trigger lawsuits that could reach the Supreme Court. A Montana volunteer group is gathering signatures for a similar ballot measure.