Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

UK-US Drug Pricing Deal Sparks Legal Threats Over NHS Drug Approval Process

5/18/2026, 12:03:52 PM

Core Event: Statutory Instrument Grants Health Secretary Power Over NICE Recommendations

In May 2026 the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) issued a statutory instrument permitting the health secretary to overrule NICE’s price recommendations for NHS medicines. The instrument took effect last month as part of a UK-US drug-pricing pact.

Context & Actors

December 2025 pact with Trump administration secures three years of tariff-free UK drug exports to US and NHS access to treatments. Global Justice Now (Nick Dearden) and Just Treatment (Diarmaid McDonald) oppose change; former health secretary Andrew Lansley says it may breach Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Official Statements

DHSC spokesperson said instrument does not erode NICE’s independence, as ministers cannot direct its recommendations, and added the deal will broaden patient access, keep UK drug exports tariff-free for three years, and approve a brain-cancer drug for patients as young as 12.

Criticism & Opposition

Global Justice Now calls the change an “unlawful power grab”; Just Treatment says it refused to publish impact assessments. MPs warn of secrecy and lack of Commons debate, and Andrew Lansley says instrument breaches Health and Social Care Act 2012.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Campaigners say the instrument lets the health secretary override NICE’s pricing judgments; the DHSC says the law prevents ministers directing NICE’s recommendations. No independent verification of the instrument’s effect has been provided.

What's Next

Global Justice Now and Just Treatment sent a nine-page “letter before claim” to DHSC, saying they will seek judicial review in the High Court unless instrument is revoked. MPs demand publication of deal’s impact assessment and a Commons debate.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “They risk sabotaging our carefully worked-out mechanism for keeping a lid on big pharma’s overinflated prices, and they have done so without so much as a debate in parliament.” — Nick Dearden, Director, Global Justice Now
  • “Diarmaid McDonald, the director of Just Treatment, said: “They’ve refused to publish their own assessments of the damage the deal will do to the NHS and they’ve used a parliamentary process designed to make it extremely difficult for MPs to properly scrutinise what they are up to.” — Diarmaid McDonald, Director, Just Treatment
  • “Nice’s independence will always be protected. It will continue to set out guidance and make recommendations entirely free from political interference, balancing clinical effectiveness with making sure taxpayers get a good deal,” — DHSC spokesperson
  • “This will mean thousands of patients have access to life-changing new treatments, including recently approving a brain cancer drug for patients as young as 12.” — DHSC spokesperson
  • “But we believe the process they have followed is unlawful and we are ready to take them to court to defend NHS patients and our democracy.” — Campaigners (Global Justice Now/Just Treatment)