Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Funding Gap Threatens Trump’s $70 Billion Gaza Reconstruction Plan

5/20/2026, 2:06:27 AM

Funding Gap in Trump’s Gaza Reconstruction Plan

A May 15 report to the United Nations Security Council by the U.S. President’s Board of Peace warned that the difference between pledged and disbursed funds must be closed “with urgency.” The reconstruction plan is estimated at $70 billion and relies on $17 billion pledged by member states, yet the board has not disclosed how much has actually been received.

Background: Creation of the Board of Peace and Its Mandate

Donald Trump established the Board of Peace to supervise an “ambitious” effort to end the Israel-Gaza war and rebuild the territory. The United Nations Security Council formally recognized the board, although many major powers have not joined the initiative. The board is tasked with allocating reconstruction money and supporting a transitional Gaza administration.

Key Actors and Member States

  • Donald Trump – Initiator of the board.
  • Nickolay Mladenov – Board of Peace envoy for Gaza, slated to brief the Security Council on May 21.
  • Board of Peace – Execution-focused organization overseeing fund allocation.
  • Member states that have pledged funds: United States, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Morocco, Uzbekistan, Kuwait.

Destruction and Reconstruction Data

The board’s assessment states that 85 % of Gaza’s buildings and infrastructure have been destroyed and that roughly 70 million tonnes of rubble must be cleared. The total reconstruction cost is projected at more than $70 billion.

Official Statements & Responses

The board emphasized that “the gap between commitment and disbursement must be closed with urgency” and urged all signatories to accelerate payments. It described itself as an “execution-focused organisation that calls capital as needed” and asserted that there are “no funding constraints.” The board denied Reuters’ claim that only a small fraction of the $17 billion pledge had been received.

Criticism and Opposition

Several states have expressed hesitation to channel reconstruction aid through the board, citing concerns over transparency and oversight. Officials from Europe and Asia indicated a preference for traditional mechanisms such as United Nations agencies. Reuters reported that the United States is considering requesting Israel to divert withheld tax revenues to the board. Under the board’s charter, permanent membership requires a $1 billion fee, but it remains unclear whether any country has paid it.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

  • Board’s position: No funding constraints, no disclosed gap size.
  • Reuters reporting: Only a small portion of the pledged $17 billion has been received, suggesting a cash shortfall.
  • Unclear details: The exact amount of disbursed funds and whether any state has satisfied the $1 billion membership fee are not publicly known.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “the gap between commitment (to the Board of Peace) and disbursement must be closed with urgency” — Board of Peace, May 15 report to the UN Security Council
  • “Funds committed but not yet disbursed represent the difference between a framework that exists on paper and one that delivers on the ground for the people of Gaza.” — Board of Peace, May 15 report
  • “execution-focused organisation that calls capital as needed” — Board of Peace official statement (April)
  • “are no funding constraints.” — Board of Peace official statement (April)

What’s Next

Nickolay Mladenov is expected to update the UN Security Council on May 21 regarding the funding gap and disbursement timeline. Concurrently, U.S. officials are reportedly evaluating the possibility of redirecting Israeli tax revenues held by the Palestinian Authority to the board, a move that could affect future financing flows.