Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Trump Administration Ends Adjustment-of-Status Pathway, Expands Immigration Courts

5/23/2026, 5:24:48 AM

Ending the Adjustment of Status Pathway

On Friday, officials announced that migrants who previously could obtain green cards through the Adjustment of Status (AOS) process must now apply at U.S. embassies abroad. The change covers economic migrants, temporary workers, tourists, students, parolees, and those with Temporary Protected Status, but excludes refugees, asylum seekers, and overseas migrants. The shift is described as a return to the “original intent of the law” (Zach Kahler, USCIS spokesperson).

Background and Prior Use of AOS

In recent years, roughly half of legalized migrants obtained status via AOS rather than consular processing. About 1.2 million migrants have used the pathway, including some with final deportation orders. Critics say the AOS route created a “scam” that incentivized low-wage employers to promise future legalization.

Key Actors

Key actors include USCIS (spokesperson Zach Kahler), Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, and immigration-policy critics such as David Bier (Cato Foundation) and the Immigration Accountability Project.

Data and Statistics

  • 1.2 million migrants pending AOS when the rule took effect.
  • 82 new immigration judges were sworn in, raising the total to 700 – the largest class ever.
  • Asylum approvals dropped from over 50 % in 2023 to 10 % in December 2025.

Official Statements & Responses

USCIS said AOS is discretionary and applicants must now show why discretion should be granted. Acting Attorney General Blanche described the judge expansion as restoring the rule of law. The administration framed the policy as closing loopholes.

Criticism & Opposition

David Bier likened the change to pulling a Jenga block, saying “the whole business model is coming down.” He tweeted, “How can Congress not impeach @USCISJoe?” The Immigration Accountability Project called the move “massively disruptive” to families and businesses dependent on AOS hiring promises.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Sources differ on the legal basis: USCIS cites statutory discretion, while critics say Congress historically authorized AOS. No independent study has quantified economic effects on employers or migrant families.

Legal Challenges & What’s Next

The policy is expected to face lawsuits; USCIS released a document on AOS discretion. Advocacy groups plan to challenge the rule in federal court, and Congress may consider legislation to restore or modify the pathway.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We’re returning to the original intent of the law to ensure aliens navigate our nation’s immigration system properly,” — Zach Kahler, USCIS spokesperson
  • “The Trump administration is committed to reestablishing an immigration judge corps that is dedicated to restoring the rule to the law in our nation’s immigration system,” — Todd Blanche, Acting Attorney General
  • “It’s like when you’re playing Jenga — if you pull this one out, the whole business model is coming down,” — David Bier, Cato Foundation