Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Trump Administration Proposes Government-Wide NDA for Federal Employees

5/27/2026, 8:23:35 AM

Proposed NDA and Its Scope

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) issued a draft nondisclosure agreement (NDA) that agencies may require of federal employees. It bars disclosure of “confidential or proprietary” information, covering internal operations, personnel, procurement and material. Violations could bring penalties, removal, debarment, and forfeiture of “royalties.” Publication will appear in Federal Register with a 30-day comment period.

Administration’s Rationale

OPM says leaks have “disrupted agency operations, eroded trust, and endangered lives.” It cites unauthorized disclosures to The New York Times and The Washington Post about January raid in Venezuela, a leak of data for 4,500 ICE agents, and FBI and DHS leaks on immigration enforcement. Maintains NDA does not add speech restrictions and preserves whistleblower disclosures.

Recent Leak Incidents Cited

Leaked pre-raid details of the Venezuelan operation, a list exposing roughly 4,500 ICE agents’ personal data, and FBI/DHS disclosures on immigration enforcement were cited recently.

Legal and Policy Context

Federal workers already follow the Privacy Act, the 1993 Standards of Ethical Conduct, and the existing federal Whistleblower Protection Act.

Opposition and Legal Concerns

Labor unions and experts warn the draft’s broad language could chill protected speech. AFGE President Everett Kelley called it “another attempt to purge the civil service of nonpartisan career employees.” Employment-law partner Kevin Owen said the whistleblower exceptions are “lip service.” Academic scholars Orly Lobel and David Loy warned of chilling effects on federal workers. ACLU attorney Esha Bhandari said the gag order violates First Amendment.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

OPM asserts NDA aligns with the Whistleblower Protection Act, but critics note draft does not specify which civil and criminal statutes would apply and how “optional” use will be enforced.

What Comes Next

The draft will be open for comment until early July; agencies may pressure employees to sign, and lawsuits are expected.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Such disclosures risk chilling candid interagency feedback, disrupting orderly decision-making, and weakening trust within and among Federal agencies,” — McLaurine Pinover, OPM Communications Director
  • “This proposed NDA is another attempt by the administration to purge the civil service of nonpartisan career employees and replace them with loyalists who won’t speak out against waste, fraud and abuse,” — Everett Kelley, AFGE National President
  • “Such broad gag orders would leave the public in the dark about how the government works, preventing the kind of informed debate that is critical to democratic accountability,” — Esha Bhandari, ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project Director
  • “In much of the private sector, employees handling sensitive business or customer information are routinely required to sign confidentiality agreements, and the federal government should not be held to a lower standard,” — Scott Kupor, OPM Director