Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Adults with Intellectual Disabilities and Cerebral Palsy Experience Higher Fall-Injury Risk at Younger Ages

5/28/2026, 10:56:52 AM

Study Reveals Early-Onset Fall Risk for Adults with IDD and CP

Researchers examined 35.8 million emergency-department (ED) visits from 2019 across 21 U.S. states. Comparing adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) or cerebral palsy (CP) to those without, they found a markedly higher likelihood of fall-related ED visits and that comparable fall-injury rates appear decades earlier than in the neurotypical population.

Background & Context

Falls are a leading cause of injury among adults 65 and older, prompting geriatric-focused screening guidelines. Prior epidemiologic data on fall risk for adults with IDD or CP were sparse, leaving clinicians without evidence-based guidance for these groups.

Data & Statistics

  • Total ED visits analyzed: 35.8 million (21 states, 2019).
  • Among adults without developmental disabilities, 7.3 % of ED visits for ages 62-65 were fall-related.
  • Adults with IDD reached similar fall-related visit percentages at ages 42-45.
  • Adults with CP showed comparable rates between ages 34-41.

These age-shifted patterns indicate an acceleration of fall vulnerability by roughly two decades for the IDD and CP cohorts.

Clinical Implications

The study authors recommend adding fall-risk assessment to routine care for adults with IDD or CP beginning in the mid-30s to mid-40s. Early screening could enable multifactorial interventions—physical therapy, home-safety evaluations, and medication review—to lower injury risk, reduce ED utilization, and prevent secondary complications such as fractures or traumatic brain injury.

Official Statements & Responses

Dr. Teal W. Benevides, PhD, corresponding author, noted that the findings “underscore the need for clinicians to consider screening these patient populations for fall risk as early as ages 34-45 years.” The research team added that “implementation of tailored fall-prevention programs within this demographic could substantially reduce the burden on emergency departments and improve quality of life for thousands living with these conditions.” They also highlighted that “current guidelines predominantly focus on fall screening and intervention in geriatric populations,” indicating a policy gap.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

All source material reports consistent age-specific risk elevations; no contradictory data were identified. The authors call for longitudinal studies to evaluate the effectiveness of early-intervention strategies and to track long-term outcomes.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Implications: The findings suggest that clinicians should consider screening these patient populations for fall risk as early as ages 34-45 years.” — Study authors, researchers
  • “Implementation of tailored fall prevention programs within this demographic could substantially reduce the burden on emergency departments and improve quality of life for thousands living with these conditions.” — Study authors, researchers
  • “Current guidelines predominantly focus on fall screening and intervention in geriatric populations.” — Study authors, researchers
  • “As clinicians and researchers delve deeper into this complex interplay between developmental disabilities, aging, and injury risk, the insights from this study provide an evidence-based foundation for early intervention strategies that could save lives and improve patient outcomes.” — Study authors, researchers

What’s Next

The investigators will discuss the findings in a podcast with Dr. Michael McKee on May 27, 2026, and the full manuscript is slated for publication in *The Annals of Family Medicine*. Stakeholders are urged to allocate resources for early-screening programs and to integrate the age-adjusted risk profile into public-health planning.