Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

EU Enlargement at a Crossroads: Montenegro’s Accession and New Staged-Access Models

5/31/2026, 11:57:46 PM

Core Event – EU Moves Toward Montenegro’s Accession and Staged Integration

In April 2024 the EU set up a working group to draft an accession treaty for Montenegro, the only candidate with a realistic near-term prospect. Simultaneously, EU leaders debated “staged accession” proposals that would grant market access and observer status to Western Balkan states, Moldova and Ukraine, while considering temporary limits on members’ veto rights.

Background & Geopolitical Context

The 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine revived enlargement as a security priority, turning accession from a technical exercise into a geopolitical tool. EU officials say expanding the bloc can reinforce stability, counter Russian influence and test the Union’s capacity to integrate reform-seeking neighbours.

Key Figures & Groups

EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, CEPS scholars Steven Blockmans and Strahinja Subotic, and the European Policy Centre drive the debate. The European Commission, EU foreign-ministers’ council and candidate governments of Montenegro, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia are also central actors.

Data & Statistics

For the first time in 17 years, the EU established a working group for Montenegro’s accession treaty. Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia have signaled willingness to accept temporary veto limits. The staged-accession model proposes early single-market access and observer status as incremental benefits.

Official Statements & Responses

Commissioner Kos said enlargement remains a Union priority and that candidate reforms must be matched by EU institutional adaptation. Merz, in a letter to EU leaders, advocated an “associate membership” for Ukraine and privileged single-market access for Western Balkan states. Blockmans noted any temporary veto limits would be time-bound and embedable in accession treaties.

Criticism & Opposition

Several member states rejected the “reverse enlargement” idea that would admit Ukraine before reforms, calling it a taboo. Critics warn temporary veto curtailments could create a “second-class membership” and undermine equal sovereign rights. Some officials argue the EU’s four-decade-old accession model may be ill-suited for rapid expansion.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

No consensus exists on the duration or sector scope of temporary veto limits, and Montenegro’s accession timeline remains undefined.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Enlargement is the priority for the European Union, and if our candidates deliver, then we have to deliver, too,” — Marta Kos, EU Enlargement Commissioner
  • “There is no clearer signal that the EU sees Montenegro as its next member state,” — Strahinja Subotic, European Policy Centre
  • “You see elements of a more staged approach, whereby benefits for reforms are being offered in earlier pre-accession phases of the process,” — Steven Blockmans, Centre for European Policy Studies

What’s Next

The draft accession treaty for Montenegro will be presented to EU foreign ministers soon, serving as a test case for staged-accession mechanisms. Follow-up talks will consider adopting temporary veto limits and extending associate-membership concepts to Ukraine and other Western Balkan candidates.