Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

EEOC Chair Proposes Ending EEO-1 Data Collection and Rescinding 1979 Race-Conscious Regulation

6/1/2026, 8:34:55 PM

Proposed Changes to EEOC Data Practices

EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, appointed by President Trump, has submitted two proposals to the White House: to stop the agency’s EEO-1 survey of employers with 100 or more workers, and to repeal the 1979 regulation that permits race- or gender-focused remedial actions. Lucas argues any program giving preferential treatment to Black people or women violates Title VII of Civil Rights Act.

Historical Role of EEO-1 Data and the Weber-Johnson Standard

Since 1966, the EEOC has required large employers to file EEO-1 reports on race, ethnicity, sex and job categories. The data have revealed under-representation of women and minorities and underpinned billions in settlements. The 1979 regulation provided a roadmap for race- and gender-conscious measures such as hiring targets, a framework upheld by Supreme Court in 1979 Weber and 1987 Johnson cases, the Weber-Johnson standard.

Data-Driven Enforcement: Bass Pro Shops Settlement

EEOC investigators used EEO-1 data to reveal low Black and Hispanic representation at Bass Pro Shops stores. The pattern prompted a probe that uncovered discriminatory managerial comments and led to a 2017 $10.5 million settlement and a pledge to recruit non-white candidates. General counsel David Lopez said the “cold, hard numbers” were essential to the case.

Responses & Opposition

Lucas warned employers have misused EEO-1 data to disadvantage white employees and men. Commissioner Chai Feldblum cautioned Supreme Court may soon revisit the Weber-Johnson precedent. General counsel Karla Gilbride said EEO-1 reports are “one of the first things that you can look at as you’re trying to learn more” about workplace disparities. David Cohen says without demographic data companies lack a “dashboard” to detect hiring bias. Critics say ending the EEO-1 survey would force EEOC to rely on subpoenas. Lucas frames the data as a tool that can be weaponized against white workers, while EEOC officials and industry experts view it as indispensable for exposing systemic discrimination.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “I think that that's a more beautiful vision of our country, and I think it's consistent with the text of the statute.” — Andrea Lucas, EEOC chair
  • “The EEOC says you can take some of these voluntary efforts, even though they will be race- or gender-conscious,” — Chai Feldblum, former EEOC commissioner
  • “It's one of the first things that you can look at as you're trying to learn more,” — Karla Gilbride, former EEOC general counsel
  • “Because they had a reason to investigate, they were able to discover that there were managerial comments that were reflective of discriminatory animus, that they were looking for a certain type of person,” — David Lopez, former EEOC general counsel

What’s Next

The proposals await White House approval. If adopted, the EEOC would cease EEO-1 reporting and repeal the 1979 guidance, reshaping how employers track diversity and how the agency enforces anti-discrimination law. Stakeholders expect legal challenges and debate over demographic data.