White House Internal Conflict Over Reviving AI Regulation Executive Order

In late May, the Trump administration halted a planned signing of an executive order to regulate advanced artificial intelligence. Officials are debating whether to resurrect the order after President Donald Trump canceled the ceremony on May 21. The discussion centers on whether a revised directive can be issued and which provisions might survive.

Wired Magazine

The administration had previously avoided AI regulation, but national-security concerns prompted drafting the order. President Trump justified the cancellation by warning that the measure could “stifle competition domestically and reduce the advantage the US maintains over China in the AI race.” The cancellation occurred hours before the scheduled signing, intensifying uncertainty among policymakers and industry leaders.

Wired Magazine

Key actors include President Donald Trump, White House officials overseeing technology policy, and AI research labs—OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google. These labs are directly referenced in the order’s most contentious provision, which would require them to provide early access to new AI models for governmental review. Additional stakeholders comprise AI executives who have expressed uncertainty about the feasibility of the order’s requirements.

Wired Magazine

The draft order envisioned a voluntary framework where AI labs would submit models up to 90 days before public release. Early access would let the White House evaluate cybersecurity capabilities. The order cited Anthropic’s Mythos and OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 as examples of models that can identify weaknesses in legacy software, underscoring the perceived national-security dimension.

Wired Magazine

President Trump told reporters the order “could stifle competition domestically and reduce the advantage the US maintains over China in the AI race.” The statement underscores the administration’s view that regulation could diminish the United States’ competitive edge in the AI race with China.

Wired Magazine

AI executives have expressed uncertainty about meeting a 90-day pre-release schedule, noting many companies are not prepared to share models that far ahead. Some leaders view the voluntary framework as a shift in the relationship between AI labs and the government, while others remain hopeful a revised order could retain less controversial elements.

Wired Magazine

Sources differ on the likelihood of the order’s revival. While several officials believe a revised directive could emerge, others describe the internal discussions as “chaotic,” reflecting divergent opinions on necessity and practicality of early model access. The absence of a clear timeline for potential signing adds to the ambiguity.

Wired Magazine

White House staff continue to assess the order’s provisions, with some aides indicating the revised order could retain only less controversial provisions. The administration has not announced a timeline for a new signing, leaving the future of the regulation uncertain.

Wired Magazine