Supreme Court’s Final Month: Cases That Could Redefine the Trump Administration

The docket includes challenges to birthright citizenship (Trump v. Barbara), agency removals (Trump v. Slaughter, Trump v. Cook), election-law disputes (Watson v. RNC, NRSC v. FEC), Second-Amendment cases (Wolford v. Lopez, United States v. Hemani), transgender-athlete bans (West Virginia v. B.P.J., Little v. Hecox), and voting-rights fights (Louisiana v. Callais, Allen v. Milligan). Decisions are expected by early July.

UsNews and World ReportSCOTUSblogAt New Supreme Court Review and Preview Program, Faculty Analyze Term's Biggest Questions

Earlier this term the Court struck down Trump’s emergency tariffs and narrowed the Voting Rights Act in *Louisiana v. Callais*, prompting new redistricting suits. It also upheld Colorado’s ban on conversion therapy (*Chiles v. Salazar*) and heard arguments on geofence warrants (*Chatrie v. United States*), showing a willingness to revisit precedent as it confronts the administration’s agenda.

SCOTUSblog

President Donald Trump leads the executive challenges. The justices most cited include Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, and the conservative bloc (Justices Gorsuch, Barrett, Thomas, Kavanaugh). Advocacy groups include the ACLU (Ben Wizner) and gun-rights organizations aligned with the NRA.

CNN

Administration says the birthright-citizenship order targets “birth tourism” and complies with the Constitution. FTC argues Slaughter’s removal violated the 1914 law limiting presidential removal of commissioners. Federal Reserve maintains Cook’s firing required cause. ACLU deputy director Ben Wizner warned the Court’s “long-term ideological project” is evident. Chief Justice Roberts defended the Court, declaring, “It’s the same Constitution.” Justice Jackson has criticized the Court’s handling of election cases.

CNN

Civil-rights groups say the birthright-citizenship challenge threatens a core 14th-Amendment right. Election scholars warn the Mississippi mail-in ballot grace period could cause voter confusion. The ACLU and LGBTQ advocates argue the transgender-athlete bans violate Title IX. Gun-rights critics claim the Hawaii gun-restriction law infringes lawful owners.

CNN

Sources differ on how many justices may reject the birthright-citizenship order (five to seven versus a “majority”). Predictions on Slaughter’s case range from likely to side with Trump to likely to protect the commissioner. Outcomes for Cook’s removal, the mail-in ballot grace period, and the transgender-athlete bans remain uncertain.

SCOTUSblog

• “They will be ruling against us on Birthright Citizenship, making us the only Country in the World that practices this unsustainable, unsafe, and incredibly costly DISASTER,” — Donald Trump, former President

CNN

• “This court has a long-term ideological project and some of these cases are squarely within it,” — Ben Wizner, Deputy Legal Director, ACLU

CNN

• “But I do think the court has lines. And I think we’ve seen some of those already.” — Ben Wizner, ACLU

CNN

• “Trump’s agenda to expand the unitary nature of the executive branch’s organization succeeds because it is only jumping on the court’s own bandwagon,” — John Yoo, Law Professor, UC Berkeley

CNN

The Court aims to release opinions by early July. A decision overturning birthright citizenship would reverse a century-old precedent; rulings on agency removals could reshape executive power; and outcomes on voting-rights, election-law, and transgender-athlete cases will affect the 2026 midterm landscape and civil-rights law.

CNN