Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Teradata Redirects Salary Increases to AI Investment, Joining Growing Tech Trend

6/5/2026, 1:20:53 PM

Salary Freeze to Fund AI Strategy

In January 2024, Teradata — a San Diego-based cloud software firm with roughly 5,100 employees — sent an internal memo announcing that the company will not provide the customary 2026 annual salary adjustments. CEO Steve McMillan said the saved budget will be redirected to accelerate the firm’s artificial-intelligence (AI) initiatives, a move framed as essential to “win in the market with AI.”

Context: AI Spending Pressures Across Tech

Teradata’s decision mirrors a broader industry shift. A recent RBC Capital CIO survey of 117 IT leaders found that 90 % plan to increase AI spending in 2026, with companies on average expecting to allocate about 1.7 % of revenue to AI. Rising costs, tighter budgets, and competitive pressure have prompted firms such as TTEC, Meta, Snap, Cisco and Salesforce to cut compensation or reduce headcount to fund AI projects.

Key Decision-Makers

  • Steve McMillan – CEO, Teradata
  • Jennifer Moss – Workplace strategist, author of *Why Are We Here?*
  • Jan-Emmanuel De Neve – Economist, Oxford University’s Wellbeing Research Center
  • Ellen Raim – Employment attorney with three decades of corporate HR experience
  • Jennifer Donahue – Teradata spokesperson

Numbers Behind the Move

  • Over 5,000 Teradata staff will miss the raise; typical annual increases have ranged 2 %–4 % for long-tenured U.S. employees.
  • The company’s headcount has dropped 21 % (?1,400 workers) since December 2023.
  • First-quarter operating loss: $36 million on $1.5 billion recurring revenue.
  • Operating expenses rose 71 % year-over-year, largely due to a $480 million legal settlement, partially offset by lower compensation expense.
  • Industry benchmarks: AI budgets projected at 1.7 % of revenue; AI spend can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars per project.

Implications for Employees and Industry

Reallocating salary budgets signals that AI is now a top-line priority, potentially reshaping compensation norms. Analysts note that cutting “the largest controllable expense” may yield short-term financial flexibility but risks eroding employee morale and trust, especially when workers are asked to adopt the very technologies that reduce their pay growth.

Company Statements

CEO McMillan framed the reallocation as a strategic necessity to stay competitive in AI. A Teradata spokesperson declined to comment on the internal decision but expressed confidence in the company’s direction. The memo clarified that performance-based bonuses and equity awards may still be available, and that employees in jurisdictions requiring market-aligned raises are exempt.

Critiques of the Compensation Shift

Workplace strategist Jennifer Moss described the public linking of AI funding to compensation cuts as a “real shift in what leaders are willing to say in public,” questioning whether the move is transparent or cynical. Economist Jan-Emmanuel De Neve warned that such cuts convey insecurity to staff, while attorney Ellen Raim cautioned that treating workers as “lower-value human capital” can be corrosive to organizational culture.

Employee Perspectives

Two U.S. employees with more than a decade at Teradata confirmed they previously received 2 %–4 % raises. They noted that, despite the freeze, bonuses and stock awards remain possible, but expressed uncertainty about long-term earnings growth.

Unresolved Issues

The memo applies only to countries without mandated market-aligned raises, leaving the impact on international staff unclear. Teradata has not disclosed the exact AI budget or timeline, and no independent verification of the projected AI ROI is available.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “We will fund this AI investment by reallocating the budget from 2026 annual salary adjustments,” — Steve McMillan, CEO, Teradata
  • “Whether that's more honest or more cynical depends on your read, but it does mark a real shift in what leaders are willing to say in public,” — Jennifer Moss, workplace strategist
  • “The reason workforce compensation ends up being the source is that it's the largest controllable expense line at most companies and the one with the least organized resistance," said Moss.” — Jennifer Moss, workplace strategist
  • “ "When leaders openly cut human compensation to fund AI, they are trying to project decisive, tech-forward management.” — Jan-Emmanuel De Neve, economist, Oxford University
  • “AI is being positioned as a way to do that quickly,” — Ellen Raim, employment attorney
  • “In a statement to The Independent, Teradata spokesperson Jennifer Donahue said, “We don't comment on internal business decisions but remain confident in the direction of the company.” — Jennifer Donahue, Teradata spokesperson

Future Outlook

Teradata plans to expand its AI talent pool throughout 2026, while monitoring the impact of compensation freezes on retention. Industry observers expect additional firms to adopt similar budget reallocations as AI projects mature, potentially prompting broader debates over the balance between technological investment and employee compensation.