Full Breakdown
Sabrina Carpenter Secures Temporary Restraining Order Against Alleged Stalker
6/5/2026, 9:05:37 PM
Restraining Order Issued
A Los Angeles County Superior Court granted pop-star Sabrina Carpenter a temporary restraining order after she alleged that a 31-year-old man repeatedly trespassed, attempted to enter her home, and conducted surveillance of her residence. The order requires the man to remain at least 100 yards (? 91 m) from Carpenter, her sister Sarah Carpenter, Sarah’s partner George Smith, and from Carpenter’s home and workplace.
Key Individuals and Their Roles
- Sabrina Carpenter – Singer-songwriter and petitioner.
- William Applegate – The alleged stalker; identified by name and age (31).
- Sarah Carpenter – Sabrina’s sister, also protected by the order.
- George Smith – Sarah’s partner, residing with the Carpenters in the Hollywood Hills.
- LAPD Detective Peter Doomanis – Provided a declaration describing Applegate’s fixation.
- Los Angeles County Superior Court – Issued the temporary restraining order and scheduled a follow-up hearing.
Timeline of Stalking Allegations
- May 23 – Applegate allegedly bypassed a security fence, approached Carpenter’s front door, pushed the door handle, rang the bell, and refused to leave until police arrived.
- May 24 (? 24 hours later) – Applegate returned, loitered outside the house for several hours before being removed by security.
- May 25 – He parked in front of the residence for an extended period, prompting police intervention.
- May 29 – Carpenter filed a civil harassment restraining order petition.
- June 17 – Court hearing scheduled to consider extending the order.
Legal Parameters and Data
The temporary order prohibits Applegate from coming within 100 yards of the protected individuals or locations. It is enforceable immediately and may be extended pending the June 17 hearing. The order is civil in nature but backed by criminal enforcement when violations occur.
Official Statements & Responses
Carpenter’s declaration described the incidents as “deliberate, calculated, and aggressive,” emphasizing severe emotional distress and fear for her safety. LAPD detective Doomanis characterized Applegate’s behavior as a “disturbing and irrational fixation” consistent with documented stalking patterns. The court’s order reflects the legal system’s response to repeated trespassing and surveillance.
Criticism & Opposition
No source provided dissenting viewpoints or criticism of Carpenter’s request for protection.
Conflicting Reports & Gaps
A declaration attributed to Detective Doomanis suggests the stalking pattern may have begun as early as April 20, 2026, a date that conflicts with other reports limiting incidents to May 2023. The discrepancy highlights uncertainty about the full timeline of Applegate’s behavior. Additionally, sources do not disclose Applegate’s motivations beyond the alleged fixation.
Verbatim Quotes
- “[The man] fabricated the outrageous and entirely false claim that he personally knew me and that I was expecting him. This was a complete lie,” — Sabrina Carpenter, declaration
- “This is not the behavior of someone who stumbled upon my property by accident,” — Sabrina Carpenter, declaration
- “This is intentional stalking and surveillance directed at me and my residence.” — Sabrina Carpenter, declaration
- “His pattern of stalking, trespassing, and surveillance has caused me severe and ongoing emotional distress, and I am in fear [of] what he may do if he is not restrained by his Court,” — Sabrina Carpenter, declaration
- “Applegate has developed a disturbing and irrational fixation on [the] petitioner. The pattern of his conduct, which may have begun as early as April 20, 2026, reflects the hallmarks of a fixated, obsessional individual. This trajectory is consistent with well-documented patterns of stalking behavior that pose a serious and escalating risk [to] victim safety.” — LAPD Detective Peter Doomanis, declaration
What’s Next
The court will review the temporary order on June 17 to determine whether to extend its provisions. Law enforcement remains tasked with enforcing the distance restriction and responding to any alleged violations.
