Senator Raphael Warnock’s Fight Over Voting Rights After Supreme Court Ruling

Warnock says the Supreme Court’s recent decision undermines voting rights, calling it “Jim Crow in new clothes.” He faced a legal battle after Georgia officials shortened the runoff period and invoked a Thanksgiving voting ban, which he sued.

New York Times

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended Jim Crow voting barriers. In 2013, the Supreme Court’s *Shelby County v. Holder* decision struck down the VRA’s preclearance formula, a move Warnock says widened the racial turnout gap.

New York Times

Warnock, senior pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church—once led by Martin Luther King Jr.—and U.S. senator, frames voting rights as a moral issue, as reflected in his book *The Crooked Places Made Straight*.

New York Times

• Runoff period cut by state officials.

New York Times

• Thanksgiving law barred voting the first weekend.

New York Times

• Warnock sued; courts and two appeals restored voting.

New York Times

• Saturday: ~70,000 voters turned out.

New York Times

• Result: Warnock won by ~100,000 votes.

New York Times

About 70,000 voters participated on Saturday, and Warnock’s margin was roughly 100,000 votes. He says the racial turnout gap has grown wider since the 2013 decision, though no specific figures are given.

New York Times

Warnock argues that incremental restrictions—shortened runoffs and holiday voting bans—disproportionately affect Black, brown, and low-income voters, shaping election outcomes and threatening democratic legitimacy.

New York Times

According to Warnock, Chief Justice John Roberts has maintained since 2013 that the nation “no longer needs the protections of the Voting Rights Act.” The recent Supreme Court ruling, which Warnock labels a new form of Jim Crow, reflects that view.

New York Times

Some observers argue that Warnock’s election shows the Voting Rights Act is no longer essential, suggesting current protections are redundant. Warnock counters that his own legal obstacles demonstrate ongoing need for robust voting safeguards.

New York Times

Warnock recalls his mother picking cotton in Waycross, Georgia, in the 1950s, and says, “The hands that used to pick somebody else’s cotton got to pick her son to be a United States senator,” linking his family’s history to the voting-rights fight.

New York Times

Warnock claims the racial turnout gap has widened since 2013, but the interview provides no independent data to confirm this. The Supreme Court’s detailed reasoning for the recent ruling is also absent from the sources.

New York Times

• “Jim Crow in new clothes.” — Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator

New York Times

• “, literally picking somebody else’s cotton in the 1950s, and because of the arc of progress in this country over the last 60 years, I often say the hands that used to pick somebody else’s cotton got to pick her son to be a United States senator.” — Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator

New York Times

• “So I decided tountietheir hands and sue them.” — Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator

New York Times

• “Chief Justice John Roberts put forward this theory that we no longer need the protections of the Voting Rights Act.” — Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator

New York Times

• “About 70,000 people voted [on Saturday]; I won by 100,000 votes.” — Raphael Warnock, U.S. Senator

New York Times