Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Southaven Residents Sue xAI Over Persistent Turbine Noise

6/11/2026, 9:14:47 PM

Lawsuit Over Southaven Power Plant

On June 8, 2026 three Southaven residents—Jason Haley, Preston Herrington and Taylor Logsdon—filed a federal class-action against xAI, SpaceX and subsidiary MZX Tech. The complaint targets the gas-turbine plant at 2875 Stanton Road South, built to power the Colossus I and II data centers. The turbines have expanded from three units to 57 by early 2026, allegedly violating Southaven’s noise ordinance. The suit covers roughly 10,000 nearby households and seeks damages, injunctive relief, punitive damages and disgorgement of profits.

Impact on Residents

The turbines emit a jet-engine-like squeal, roaring and rumbling that cross property lines. Residents report tinnitus, insomnia, anxiety, headaches and reduced outdoor activity. The plant sits half a mile from homes and one mile from an elementary school; plaintiffs say the noise has lowered property values.

Official Statements & Responses

The NAACP alleges xAI operates 27 turbines without required air permits, emitting over 1,700 tons of nitrogen oxides and formaldehyde each year. The Department of Justice signaled possible intervention in the NAACP suit, with a June 15 deadline. Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves endorsed the $20 billion investment as an economic development for the state.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics argue xAI prioritizes profit over residents’ rights, violating the noise ordinance and the Clean Air Act. Community groups call for stricter permitting and mitigation. MZX Tech’s $1.4 million donation to the Southaven Police Department has raised enforcement concerns.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Sources differ on turbine count—some cite “more than 50,” others list 57. The class action targets noise, while the NAACP suit emphasizes air-pollution violations. No comment has been received from xAI, SpaceX or MZX Tech.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “As a result of Defendants’ ongoing and continuous operation of the Southaven plant, Plaintiffs and class members have suffered and continue to suffer harm,” — Complaint
  • “It is a textbook example of putting profits over people, with corporate interests trampling residents’ fundamental right to use and enjoy their property.” — Complaint
  • “There are communities like Southaven that are being forced to live with this relentless industrial noise and vibration pollution every single day, and it’s diminishing their quality of lives,” — Emma Dietz, associate attorney, Weitz & Luxenberg
  • “Our homes are supposed to be a sanctuary for us against the world.” — Robert Wiygul, plaintiffs’ attorney

What’s Next

The case moves toward an injunction to limit turbine operation. DOJ involvement in the NAACP suit may broaden regulatory scrutiny. If the MACROHARDRR data center proceeds, added power demand could spark further community challenges.