Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

EU Targets Russian Soldiers with Proposed Visa Ban

6/13/2026, 12:58:23 PM

The Proposed Visa Ban: Core Details

On 9 June 2026 the European Commission announced that the EU’s 21st sanctions package will bar anyone who has served in the Russian Armed Forces since the 2022 invasion of Ukraine from entering the Schengen Area. The measure applies to current and former Russian soldiers, including non-Russian nationals who fought for Moscow. Adoption requires unanimous approval by all 27 member states, with a target adoption date in July 2026.

Context: Sanctions Evolution and the 21st Package

Since the 2014 annexation of Crimea, the EU has layered sanctions on Russia, intensifying after the full-scale invasion in February 2022. The 21st package expands pressure on energy, finance, the “shadow fleet” of tankers, and now visa policy. Nordic and Baltic states first suggested a combatant-only entry ban in February–March 2026, arguing that former soldiers “play a role in Moscow’s shadow war against Europe.” The proposal follows a broader EU strategy to tighten loopholes while preserving a unified stance.

Main Actors Behind the Measure

Key proponents include European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU foreign-policy chief Kaja Kallas, who framed the ban as “Europe’s door should not be open to Russia’s (ex-)combatants.” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha welcomed the step, calling it “fair” and a clear signal that participation in the war carries travel consequences. The Kremlin, via spokesman Dmitry Peskov, dismissed the proposal, noting that Russian banks have “earned large profits” despite existing sanctions. Nordic-Baltic members (Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden) have been vocal supporters, while France, Italy and Spain continue issuing large numbers of Russian tourist visas.

Numbers Behind the Policy

Confidential data cited by Euractiv show EU-issued visas to Russian citizens rising from a historic low of 462 000 in 2023 to 632 000 in 2025, with France, Italy and Spain accounting for roughly three-quarters of the total. The sanctions package targets nearly 90 banks with asset freezes and adds 31 more Russian banks to transaction bans, plus 20 third-country banks. It also proposes adding 30 additional vessels to the shadow-fleet blacklist, bringing the total to over 660 ships. Russian LNG imports to the EU reached 8.37 million tonnes in the first five months of 2026, a 17.9 % increase year-on-year, with Spain the largest importer.

Anticipated Effects and Strategic Rationale

The visa ban aims to deter recruitment for Russia’s war effort, limit the mobility of combatants, and reinforce the EU’s moral stance. It also signals to member states that the bloc will not tolerate individuals directly involved in the invasion. However, the measure could reduce tourism revenue for visa-issuing states and faces resistance from countries that benefit economically from Russian visitors.

Official Positions

Von der Leyen presented the ban as “the first time we propose to bar entry into the EU for anyone who has served in the Russian Armed Forces.” Kallas described the broader sanctions as “collapsing the foundations of Russia’s war economy.” Sybiha argued the ban “sends a clear signal that participation in Russia’s war carries consequences beyond the battlefield.” Peskov countered that “our largest banks have long been under sanctions… this does not prevent them from earning large profits.”

Dissent and Member-State Concerns

France, Italy and Spain have continued granting large numbers of Russian tourist visas, raising the prospect that these states may lobby against tightening visa rules. Critics note that the ban targets only soldiers, leaving other Russian citizens unrestricted, and question whether the measure alone can meaningfully impact Moscow’s war capacity.

Uncertainties and Missing Information

Sources differ on the exact trajectory of visa issuance, with Euractiv’s 2025 figure lacking independent verification. The proposal does not specify how many former