Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Swiss Parliament Reopens Nuclear Plant Ban Amid Political and Financial Hurdles

6/18/2026, 10:24:44 PM

Parliamentary Reversal of the Construction Ban

On 27 May 2024 the National Council voted 100 to 97 (with two abstentions) to refer the Federal Council’s counter-proposal to the “Stop the Blackout” initiative back to the executive for revision. The motion, supported by the SP, the Greens, the GLP and a majority of the centrist faction, demands detailed financing plans before any framework permits can be issued. The Council of States will consider the revised proposal next week.

Energy Strategy 2050 and the Phase-out Legacy

Switzerland’s Energy Strategy 2050 aims to meet electricity demand with renewable sources—hydropower, solar, wind and biomass—while maintaining a reliable, low-carbon supply. The 2017 nuclear phase-out, which halted new construction, is now being reassessed as the ban on building fresh reactors was technically lifted by the National Council’s earlier approval of the counter-proposal.

Key Stakeholders

  • Federal Council & Energy Minister Albert Rösti – argue that baseload power, especially in winter, is essential and that nuclear remains an option if renewables fall short.
  • Utility Axpo – operator of Beznau and shareholder in Leibstadt (39.1 %) and Gösgen (25 %); cites “political, regulatory and financial risks” and rules out building a pioneering mini-reactor.
  • Alpiq – holds 40 % of Gösgen and 27.4 % of Leibstadt; states that a new plant “does not arise in the current environment and under the current regulatory framework.”
  • Municipalities of Leibstadt and Döttingen (Aargau) – have signaled willingness to allocate part of their territory for a new site.

Cost and Timeline Estimates

Energy expert Walter Rüegg estimates construction, operation and decommissioning at 5–8 billion CHF per gigawatt. Gösgen (1.01 GW) and Leibstadt (1.23 GW) would therefore require roughly 5–10 billion CHF each. Axpo projects the earliest commissioning date at 2050, while broader industry forecasts place any new Swiss reactor no earlier than the mid-2040s.

Official Statements & Responses

  • The Federal Council maintains that the legal framework now permits granting of construction permits, but stresses the need for a “comprehensive risk assumption” by the state before any private investor proceeds.
  • The Committee on the Environment, Spatial Planning and Energy (Urek-N) emphasizes that keeping nuclear as an option safeguards a “reliable, low-carbon, cost-effective energy supply” should renewable targets slip.
  • Energy Minister Rösti warned that “nothing less than the country’s energy security was at stake” and that “objections are slowing down the expansion of hydroelectric and wind power.”

Criticism & Opposition

Opponents argue that new nuclear plants would be financially untenable without state subsidies, could crowd out hydropower, and would delay renewable deployment. They also cite safety and security concerns, pointing to the centralized nature of nuclear sites as potential targets for terrorism.

Conflicting Projections & Gaps

  • Timeline: industry analysts cite 2045-2046, while Axpo’s internal estimate pushes the date to 2050.
  • Cost: Rüegg’s 5–8 billion CHF/GW estimate contrasts with international projects that have exceeded original budgets by up to fourfold (e.g., Finland’s Olkiluoto).
  • SMR viability: while small modular reactors promise faster deployment, no Swiss utility has committed to a pilot, and a U.S. SMR project was halted over cost overruns.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “At the moment, no one is willing to invest in a new nuclear power plant anyway, said Clarence Chollet (Greens/NE).” — Clarence Chollet, Greens/NE
  • “Safety Concerns Without subsidies, new nuclear power plants would not be competitive for years to come, noted Marie-France Roth Pasquier (Center/FR).” — Marie-France Roth Pasquier, Center/FR
  • “The centralized organization of nuclear power plants makes them an easy target for terrorist attacks and military strikes, said Niklaus Samuel Gugger (EVP/ZH).” — Niklaus Samuel Gugger, EVP/ZH
  • “A look at Ukraine is enough to understand the extent of this risk.” — Niklaus Samuel Gugger, EVP/ZH
  • “ “This makes no sense” Energy Minister Albert Rösti said that nothing less than the country’s energy security was at stake.” — Albert Rösti, Energy Minister

What’s Next

The Council of States will vote on whether to accept the revised counter-proposal. If approved, the federal government must draft a financing model and initiate site-selection procedures, a process that could extend well into the 2030s before any construction permit is granted.