Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

MEPB Upholds Usyk Victory After Contested Stoppage in Verhoeven Fight

6/19/2026, 4:59:36 AM

Contested Stoppage in Usyk vs Verhoeven Bout

Oleksandr Usyk faced Rico Verhoeven in Egypt in May 2024. In the 11th round Usyk knocked Verhoeven down; the Dutchman beat the count, but a flurry in the final seconds led referee Mark Lyson to stop the bout after the bell. Usyk was declared the winner and retained his world heavyweight titles. Referee Lyson later told the commission he had seen sufficient damage to intervene before the bell, a claim the commission later found inaccurate.

Background and Fighter Profiles

Oleksandr Usyk, a Ukrainian, entered as the unified world heavyweight champion defending multiple titles. Rico Verhoeven, a 37-year-old Dutch former cruiserweight champion, moved up to heavyweight and was seen as a credible challenger capable of an upset. The bout was billed as a test of Usyk’s dominance against a seasoned opponent with a strong knockout record. The fight was promoted as a possible upset, with analysts noting Verhoeven’s power could challenge Usyk’s technical style.

Timeline of the Dispute

May 2024 – Usyk-Verhoeven fight ends in an 11th-round stoppage after the bell. In the weeks that followed, Verhoeven appealed to the Middle East Professional Boxing Commission (MEPB), claiming the referee acted post-bell. On a Wednesday (date undisclosed), MEPB ruled the stoppage occurred after the bell but affirmed the result and dismissed the protest.

Official Statements & Responses

The MEPB confirmed the bout ended after the bell but said the timing did not affect the outcome. The commission stressed that referee Mark Lyson acted in good faith, prioritising boxer safety, and noted an overturn would be possible only if the referee had not intervened. Verhoeven’s appeal argued the stoppage came after the official round. The commission noted its authority to overturn only if a referee’s error directly altered the fight’s result.

Criticism & Opposition

Critics called the stoppage harsh, noting Verhoeven beat the count before a flurry after the round ended. Observers said the post-bell timing raised procedural concerns and could set a precedent. The perception of an overly cautious referee sparked debate over safety versus competitive fairness. Some observers argued the decision undermined the challenger’s right to a full round, raising questions about consistency in enforcement.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “and with the paramount objective of boxer safety” — MEPB
  • “In its ruling, seen by BBC Sport, the commission agreed that the fight had been concluded after the bell sounded - but said it had no bearing on the outcome.” — MEPB
  • “The referee at the centre of the controversial fight between Oleksandr Usyk and Rico Verhoeven last month told a boxing commission he had seen enough to stop the bout in the 11th round before the bell sounded.” — Mark Lyson (as reported)
  • “MEPB said Lyson acted in good faith "and with the paramount objective of boxer safety", and said it could have only overturned the result had the referee not acted that way.” — MEPB

What’s Next

The MEPB’s ruling leaves the result unchanged; Usyk remains the unified heavyweight champion. No further appeals have been announced, and future heavyweight bouts in the region are expected to follow the commission’s safety guidelines.