Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

EU Pushes New Trade-Defence Tools to Counter China’s Export Surge

6/20/2026, 5:32:48 AM

EU Proposes a Diversification Instrument

At a summit in Brussels on 18-19 June, EU leaders tasked the European Commission with drafting a “diversification instrument” that would require companies to spread critical-component sourcing across multiple countries. The measure aims to accelerate de-risking from China, which the bloc says has created a trade deficit of roughly €1 billion per day and an over-reliance on Chinese raw materials.

Background: Record Deficits and Export Growth

China’s 2023-24 export surplus hit $1.2 trillion, prompting a shift of Chinese goods toward Europe after U.S. tariffs cut shipments to America by 37 % in the first four months of 2025. EU imports of Chinese products rose 16.4 % in the January-May period, widening the bloc’s goods-trade deficit with China to about €360 billion in 2025—equivalent to the €1 billion-per-day figure cited by officials. The surge includes electric vehicles, batteries, solar panels, and high-tech machinery, sectors where Chinese firms now compete with 58 % of euro-area exports, up from 46 % in 2000.

Key Actors

  • Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission, announced the diversification proposal.
  • Antonio Costa, President of the European Council, warned the €1 billion-per-day deficit is “simply unsustainable.”
  • Maros Sefcovic, EU trade chief, described the relationship with China as needing a “reset, not confrontation.”
  • Emmanuel Macron, President of France, called for a “European equivalent of Section 301.”
  • Friedrich Merz, German Chancellor, urged protection against “distortions of competition.”
  • Bart De Wever, Belgian Prime Minister, highlighted the uneven impact of any retaliation.

Data Snapshot

  • Trade deficit with China: €1 billion per day (von der Leyen, Costa) vs. €360 billion annual total (Eurostat, Bloomberg).
  • Chinese export share of global goods: 16 % in 2024, up from 4 % in 2000 (AP).
  • State subsidies: Chinese firms receive 3-8 times more support than OECD peers (OECD, RFI).
  • EU-wide rare-earth dependence: critical for EVs, wind turbines, defence systems.

Why It Matters

The EU argues that unchecked Chinese subsidies and export dominance threaten European industrial sovereignty, could be weaponised in geopolitical disputes, and risk eroding domestic manufacturing capacity. Diversifying supply chains is presented as a safeguard for jobs in Germany, France, and other member states while preserving market access to China’s large consumer base.

Official Statements & Responses

  • The Commission will use the new instrument to act “as soon as there is a suspicion of unfair competition,” according to von der Leyen.
  • Sefcovic emphasized a “de-risking, not decoupling” approach, insisting dialogue with Beijing must continue.
  • Macron pledged “strong measures, possibly tariffs,” if China fails to address the imbalance.
  • Germany’s position remains cautious; officials say any tool must avoid targeting specific recipients to limit retaliation risk.

Criticism & Opposition

German industry groups report that only 10 % of procurement has shifted away from China in three years, warning that rapid diversification could raise costs and disrupt supply. Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez urged a balanced, pragmatic stance, warning that aggressive measures might harm European firms reliant on Chinese inputs.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Sources differ on the exact size of the deficit (daily €1 billion vs. annual €360 billion) and on the timeline for the instrument’s rollout, with the Commission hinting at a September State of the Union presentation but no firm date. Data on how many firms have already diversified remain sparse.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “There is a need for improvement. We've seen the figures, they speak for themselves, and we have to rebalance our relationship,” — Ursula von der Leyen, President, European Commission
  • “We cannot continue to raise this issue without any concrete results. And until now, unfortunately, China didn't deliver,” — Antonio Costa, President, European Council
  • “China’s export surge, unless its leaders rein it in, will provoke a protectionist wave against Chinese imports worldwide,’’ said Maurice Obstfeld, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.” — Maurice Obstfeld, Senior Fellow, Peterson Institute
  • “The second China shock is characterized by its companies running the board on manufacturing exports -- from low-tech, low-wage to high-tech high value-added industries,” — Eswar Prasad, Professor, Cornell University
  • “we are protecting our interests and our economy against distortions of competition caused by the trade practices of other states.” — Friedrich Merz, Chancellor, Germany

What’s Next

The Commission is expected to present the diversification instrument to the European Parliament later this year, followed by possible adoption at the EU’s annual summit. Simultaneously, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic has invited Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao to Brussels for talks aimed at preventing escalation. The outcome will shape Europe’s trade-defence posture amid a deepening China-EU economic rivalry.