Judge Blocks USPS Mail-In Ballot Restrictions Amid Trump Election Push

On July 1, 2026, U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in Washington, D.C., issued an injunction preventing the United States Postal Service from implementing a rule that would limit delivery of mail-in ballots to voters on state-provided lists. Sullivan held that the proposal breaches a 2021 settlement with the NAACP that obligates the agency to ensure timely election-mail handling through the 2028 cycle.

New York Times

The December 2021 settlement with the NAACP required the USPS to prioritize monitoring and timely delivery of election mail and to take extraordinary measures for ballot handling. President Donald Trump’s March 2026 executive order directed the Department of Homeland Security to compile lists of citizens eligible to vote and instructed the USPS to deliver ballots only to those on the lists. In May 2026 the Postal Service proposed a rule that would withhold delivery from states that did not provide lists or adopt ballot procedures.

ReutersNew York Times

• Dec 2021 – USPS-NAACP settlement

Reuters

• Mar 2026 – Trump executive order

Reuters

• May 2026 – USPS proposes ballot-delivery rule

Reuters

• Jun 25 2026 – Judge Indira Talwani blocks the order

New York Times

• Jul 1 2026 – Judge Sullivan blocks the USPS rule

Reuters

Judge Sullivan said the Postal Service’s plan would violate the settlement agreement and appeared designed to exert federal control over who may receive a mail-in or absentee ballot. The NAACP argued the rule would undermine the settlement’s requirement for extraordinary measures. The Postal Service and Justice Department declined comment.

New York Times

Civil-rights groups and legal analysts say the administration’s fraud narrative lacks evidence and that the restrictions would disenfranchise voters, especially in states refusing to share voter-list data. Settlement supporters view the ruling as a check on executive overreach.

Reuters

A Washington judge previously declined to halt the executive order because the Postal Service’s rules were not yet finalized, creating a brief inconsistency in judicial responses. The Postal Service and Justice Department have not explained how the proposed rule would operate.

New York Times

• “designed to exert federal control over who in the United States may be sent a mail-in or absentee ballot in federal elections by the Postal Service.” — Judge Emmet G. Sullivan

New York Times

• “extraordinary measures” — NAACP settlement provision

Reuters

• “Trump has long said, without providing evidence, that mail-in voting is prone to fraud.” — Reuters reporting

Reuters

• “The ruling from Judge Indira Talwani stated that the Constitution granted authority over elections firmly to the states.” — Judge Indira Talwani (June 25 ruling)

New York Times

The ruling leaves the existing delivery framework in place for the November 3, 2026 midterms, and the Postal Service will need to determine how to proceed while remaining compliant with the 2021 settlement.

New York Times