Story perspectives

Supreme Court Upholds Fed Independence, Birthright Citizenship, Voting Rights Limits

7/3/2026

Summary

Story summary

The Court ruled a president may remove agency members without cause, preserving the Federal Reserve (Fed) independence.
On July 1, 2026, the Court rejected President Donald Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship, affirming the 14th Amendment.
The Court struck down a federal limit on coordinated campaign spending, citing First Amendment protections.
Court narrowed Voting Rights Act’s Section 2 standard, upheld bans on transgender athletes, and made it harder to challenge gerrymandered districts.

History

Historical Context

In 1976 the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckley v. Valeo held that limits on campaign expenditures violate the First Amendment while upholding contribution caps. The ruling launched a line of cases—First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti (1978) and Citizens United v. FEC (2010)—that progressively broadened political-spending protections. These precedents have shaped today’s expansive free-speech doctrine for election finance.

1 of 2

Story summary

The Court ruled a president may remove agency members without cause, preserving the Federal Reserve (Fed) independence.
On July 1, 2026, the Court rejected President Donald Trump’s order ending birthright citizenship, affirming the 14th Amendment.
The Court struck down a federal limit on coordinated campaign spending, citing First Amendment protections.
Court narrowed Voting Rights Act’s Section 2 standard, upheld bans on transgender athletes, and made it harder to challenge gerrymandered districts.

1 / 2