Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Andy Burnham’s Push to Overhaul Homes England and Accelerate Council Housing

7/3/2026, 10:21:25 PM

Core Proposal: Abolish Homes England for Direct Mayoral Funding

Andy Burnham, Labour’s prime-ministerial candidate, proposes dismantling the Whitehall quango Homes England and moving its £39 billion ten-year affordable-housing budget to regional mayoral combined authorities, letting mayors acquire land and commission council homes. Mayors Steve Rotheram (Liverpool) and David Skaith (York) back the plan.

Data & Funding Challenges

  • Burnham must find an extra £4.7 billion for his first budget after Labour’s £15 billion defence increase.
  • The construction sector lacks 206,000 workers by 2030, needing 41,200 new recruits annually; EU labour loss of roughly 200,000 since 2019 worsens the gap (CITB, UK Trade Skills Index).
  • Planning approval averages three to four years, a timeline developers label “getting worse”.

Official Statements & Government Action

Starmer’s administration has introduced legislation to ease building on “grey-belt” land and is consulting reforms that would strip planning permission from developers who miss deadlines. Homes England chair Pat Ritchie said the agency processes social-affordable bids, but any structural change will need No 10 guidance. Burnham has urged redirecting £39 billion budget to council-rent homes and using vacant land to cut costs.

Criticism, Opposition, and Planning Constraints

Economist David Crosthwaite warned the building wave raises the questions “Who is going to build them? Who is going to pay for them?”. A house-building industry source doubts breaking up Homes England will retain flexibility to reallocate funds. Some mayors lack planning expertise or workforce capacity, and the three-to-four-year planning timeline threatens delivery.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

Mayors Steve Rotheram and David Skaith say direct funding will speed council-home delivery, while a house-building industry source warns breaking up Homes England could reduce flexibility and risk under-spending. Mechanism for reallocating £39 billion budget remains undefined.

Why It Matters

Reconfiguring Homes England could reshape affordable-housing delivery and test Labour’s fiscal capacity amid a strained construction market.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Who is going to build them? Who is going to pay for them?” — Dr David Crosthwaite, chief economist, Building Cost Information Service
  • “Homes England has been too slow and clunky at delivering affordable housing from Whitehall, said Dr Simon Kaye, director of policy at the Re:State think-tank, whose advisory board includes Conservative and Labour figures.” — Dr Simon Kaye, director of policy, Re:State
  • “Homes England does important work and has teams based across the country, but where strong mayoral combined authorities are already in place, I believe their powers and funding should be devolved to local leaders.” — Steve Rotheram, Labour Mayor, Liverpool City Region
  • “The process is getting worse – it’s taking three or four years to get approval. It must be made quicker,” — Rico Wojtulewicz, director of policy, National Federation of Builders

What’s Next

Burnham is expected to become prime minister by month’s end. Steps include a No 10 decision on Homes England, parliamentary debate on grey-belt reforms, and actions to tackle construction-worker shortfall.