Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Trump’s Cancellation of the USDA Food-Security Survey Threatens Hunger Measurement

7/10/2026, 4:28:55 PM

Cancellation of the USDA Food-Security Survey

On September 2025, President Donald Trump ordered the termination of the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s 30-year-old food-security survey, a supplement to the Census Bureau’s Current Population Survey. The survey, which asked 18 questions about household food access, had been the “gold standard” for tracking hunger trends. The USDA described the survey as “redundant, costly, politicized, and extraneous” in a press release. The White House declined to comment on the decision.

Measurement Gap and Child Hunger Concerns

The final USDA survey, released in December 2025, reported that 13.7 % of households experienced food insecurity—the highest rate in a decade. With the survey gone, experts warn that policymakers lack a reliable tool to gauge the impact of recent SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) cuts, which have already removed benefits from roughly 4.7 million participants (about 11 % of SNAP households). Other surveys from the Urban Institute, the University of Southern California, and food banks exist, but officials say none match the USDA survey’s breadth or representativeness. Crucially, no alternative collects comparable data on child food insecurity, leaving a blind spot for a demographic already at risk.

Official Responses

A USDA spokesperson noted that federal and some state agencies continue to collect hunger data through other surveys, though the agency cautioned that SNAP enrollment figures do not directly reflect food-insecurity levels. Democratic Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester, co-sponsor of legislation to revive the survey, said the cuts “have weakened federal efforts to address food insecurity and made it more difficult to understand where service gaps exist.” Maine Governor Janet Mills’ office announced plans to produce a statewide hunger report by early 2027 after the federal data gap emerged.

Criticism from Experts and State Officials

Economist Craig Gundersen (Baylor University) called the loss of the survey a “void in information on prevalence of food insecurity.” Food-economist Parke Wilde (Tufts University) warned that while other entities will still report statistics, “the statistics that they report won’t be as good.” Cornell University visiting scholar Matthew Rabbitt, who led the USDA survey’s final three years, said without current measures “we can’t make informed policy decisions.” Maine lawmakers, citing the survey’s role in benchmarking progress toward ending hunger by 2030, passed a state law in March 2026 to create an annual state-level food-insecurity survey.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “It’s definitely going to be a void in information on prevalence of food insecurity,” — Michele Ver Ploeg, senior fellow, National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy
  • “It’s not like nobody is going to be reporting relevant statistics; it’s just that the statistics that they report won’t be as good,” — Parke Wilde, food economist, Tufts University
  • “If we don’t have measures of food insecurity at this point, we can’t make informed policy decisions,” — Matthew Rabbitt, visiting scholar, Cornell University
  • “Accurate data is critical to ensure we target resources where they’re needed most,” — Lisa Blunt Rochester, Democratic Senator

These developments underscore a growing uncertainty about the nation’s hunger landscape as federal data collection recedes.