Publishers and Author Sue Google Over Gemini AI Training

On July 10, 2026, Hachette Book Group, Cengage Learning, Elsevier and bestselling author Scott Turow filed a federal class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint alleges that Google “reproduced millions of copyrighted works without permission… and with full knowledge that its conduct violated copyright law.” The plaintiffs contend that Google copied books and journal articles supplied for limited services—Google Books, Google Play Books and Google Scholar—and used them to train its generative-AI system Gemini. They seek statutory damages, a permanent injunction prohibiting further infringement, and an order to destroy any unauthorized copies used in training.

GizmodoPublishers, Authors File Class Action Lawsuit Against GoogleThe GuardianEngadgetAM New YorkCNET

The suit joins a wave of copyright actions targeting AI developers. Earlier class actions against Meta (2023) and a $1.5 billion settlement with Anthropic (2025) centered on similar claims that AI models were trained on unlicensed books. In 2024, a group of authors—including Kazuo Ishiguro, Philippa Gregory and Richard Osman—published an “empty” book to protest AI-driven copying. Courts have so far favored AI firms in several cases, but judges have warned that future rulings could shift.

CNET

• Hachette Book Group – the third-largest U.S. trade publisher.

Gizmodo

• Cengage Learning – a major provider of textbooks and digital learning materials.

Gizmodo

• Elsevier – an academic publisher of journals such as *The Lancet* and *Cell*.

Gizmodo

• Scott Turow – author of crime novels like *Presumed Innocent*.

The Guardian

These entities claim collective ownership of a proposed class of authors and publishers whose works were allegedly misused.

Engadget

• The complaint cites “millions of copyrighted works” copied for Gemini training.

Engadget

• Internal Google documents reportedly flagged potential fines of $10 billion–$100 billion.

The Guardian

• Gemini boasts over 650 million monthly active users.

AM New York

• Google’s 2025 quarterly revenue approached $100 billion, driven largely by AI services.

Gizmodo

• The suit alleges Gemini can generate a 100-page murder mystery in 20 minutes for $0.39, undercutting traditional publishing economics.

AM New York

The plaintiffs’ filing asserts that Google “abandoned its early motto of ‘Don’t be evil’” and that the company “could have simply bought the rights… but didn’t.” The complaint emphasizes that the unauthorized copying “displaces legitimate sales” and “weakens the growing licensing market.” Google has not responded to requests for comment, and it previously opposed authors’ participation in a related 2023 copyright case.

Publishers, Authors File Class Action Lawsuit Against Google

Legal analysts note that while publishers argue AI threatens creative incentives, some industry observers view generative models as tools that could expand readership. Prior rulings have upheld AI developers’ use of publicly available data, suggesting a legal gray zone that the current suit seeks to clarify.

CNET

The exact number of works copied and the internal risk assessments cited by the complaint are based on undisclosed Google documents; independent verification is lacking. No Google representative has confirmed or denied the allegations, leaving a key evidentiary gap.

The Guardian

• “Desperate to maintain its online dominance, Google abandoned its early motto of ‘Don’t be evil’ and engaged in one of the most prolific infringements of copyrighted materials in history,” — *the suit*

The Guardian

• “No publisher or author can compete with that.” — *the suit*

The Guardian

• “The scale and speed at which Gemini can create books and compete with human writers is unprecedented,” — *the complaint*

CNET

• “Google reproduced millions of copyrighted works without permission, without providing any compensation to authors or publishers, and with full knowledge that its conduct violated copyright law,” — *lawsuit*

Engadget

• “If left unaddressed, Google will continue to infringe Plaintiffs’ and the Class’s rights, cause broad and lasting damage to the literary industry and authors, and weaken the incentive to create that is at the core of the Copyright Act.” — *the lawsuit*

Gizmodo