Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

DOJ Accuses UC San Diego Medical School of Racially Skewed Admissions

7/21/2026, 12:45:10 PM

Core Allegations

On July 20, 2026 the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine (UC San Diego Med) “intentionally discriminated against applicants by granting and denying admission based on race.” The civil-rights division’s eight-page letter claims the school used a “shadow application process” that relied on applicants’ self-described hardships as a proxy for race, steering Black and Hispanic candidates into interviews while disadvantaging white and Asian applicants. The DOJ says it will seek a voluntary resolution and will file suit if talks fail.

Background & Context

The investigation follows a four-month review that began in March 2026 and is part of a broader Trump-administration crackdown on race-based admissions at universities, especially in California. The DOJ has opened civil-rights probes into 15 medical schools, previously targeting UCLA, UC Davis, Stanford and Ohio State. The actions occur after the 2023 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down affirmative-action programs at Harvard and the University of North Carolina, and after California’s long-standing ban on considering race in admissions.

Data & Statistics

  • UC San Diego Med receives roughly 10,400 applications annually and invites about 1,000 candidates to interview; each incoming class averages 140 students.
  • DOJ analysis shows the admission rate for Black applicants was more than double that for white applicants in three consecutive years. In the 2023 class, 6.18 % of Black applicants were admitted versus 2.45 % of white applicants.
  • Admitted Black and Latino students had lower median MCAT scores and GPAs than admitted white and Asian students.
  • The university received about $427 million in National Institutes of Health research funding in the prior fiscal year.

Official Statements & Responses

The DOJ’s statement asserts that “San Diego Med’s documents show that admissions staff used purportedly ‘race-neutral’ subjective criteria to deliberately increase admission of so-called ‘under-represented minorities in medicine’, which includes Black and Hispanic applicants.” Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet K. Dhillon added that the school’s “shadow application process unlawfully judged applicants for admission based on their race.”

UC San Diego responded that it is “reviewing the communication” from the DOJ and remains “committed to full compliance with federal law.” A university spokesperson emphasized that “all applicants to the school’s Doctor of Medicine program must meet strict academic thresholds, a requirement that is and was applied uniformly to all applicants.”

Criticism & Opposition

Civil-rights advocates argue that diversity-focused admissions help remedy historic inequities for marginalized groups, including women, LGBTQ individuals and ethnic minorities. Critics of the DOJ’s approach contend that the investigations threaten academic freedom and may jeopardize federal research funding for the UC system, potentially costing “hundreds of millions of dollars” if unresolved.

Conflicting Reports & Gaps

The DOJ cites internal emails recommending selection of lower-scoring applicants from “Group C” to boost minority enrollment, while the university maintains that its thresholds are uniformly applied. The DOJ’s analysis relies on data from 2020-2025, but the school provided only 75 documents in response to the request for records, leaving portions of the admissions process unexamined.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “San Diego Med’s documents show that admissions staff used purportedly ‘race-neutral’ subjective criteria to deliberately increase admission of so-called ‘under-represented minorities in medicine’, which includes Black and Hispanic applicants,” — DOJ statement
  • “Rather than rely on MCAT scores or GPA, San Diego Med’s shadow application process unlawfully judged applicants for admission based on their race,” — Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon
  • “San Diego Med’s blatant efforts to prioritize race are illegal, and we will end these practices.” — Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon
  • “All applicants to the school’s Doctor of Medicine program must meet strict academic thresholds, a requirement that is and was applied uniformly to all applicants.” — UC San Diego spokesperson
  • “recommend that we purposely select some students from Group C,” — Director of admissions (internal email)

What’s Next

The DOJ seeks a voluntary agreement to bring UC San Diego Med’s admissions into compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. If negotiations fail, the department indicated it will file a civil suit to enforce the law.