Story perspectives

Education Dept Drops Disparate-Impact Rule, Demands Intent Evidence

7/25/2026

Summary

Education Dept Rescinds

The U.S. Education Department rescinded the 1979 policy that allowed statistical disparities as evidence of Title VI discrimination, effective July 24, 2026.
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey said investigators must now prove intentional discrimination by other means, giving schools more flexibility in discipline.
A coalition of 60 civil-rights and education groups condemned the rescission as having “no basis in law or morality.”

Summary

Trump Ends Rules

U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order and earlier rescissions prompted the Education, Justice, EEOC and Energy departments to drop disparate-impact rules in civil-rights enforcement.
The 1971 Supreme Court case Griggs v. Duke Power Co. created the test for disparate-impact liability.
The 2001 Supreme Court decision Alexander v. Sandoval removed the private right to sue over disparate-impact claims, leaving enforcement to federal agencies.

History

Historical Context

President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed by a 73-27 Senate vote, creating Title VI to bar discrimination in federally funded programs. After decades of guidance allowing disparate-impact tests, the Education Department in 2026 withdrew that guidance, returning to the act’s original requirement that plaintiffs show intentional bias. Legal scholars warn the change threatens enforcement by the EEOC and DOJ.

1 of 3

Education Dept Rescinds

The U.S. Education Department rescinded the 1979 policy that allowed statistical disparities as evidence of Title VI discrimination, effective July 24, 2026.
Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights Kimberly Richey said investigators must now prove intentional discrimination by other means, giving schools more flexibility in discipline.
A coalition of 60 civil-rights and education groups condemned the rescission as having “no basis in law or morality.”

1 / 3