Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

French Student Fined for Singapore Straw-Licking Prank

7/30/2026, 8:37:03 PM

Core Event

Didier Gaspard Owen Maximilien, a 19-year-old French national studying at Singapore’s ESSEC Business School, was convicted of public nuisance after he removed a straw from a freshly squeezed orange-juice vending machine, licked it, and returned it to the dispenser. He filmed the act for an Instagram story; the video later went viral. An employee of the machine’s operator saw the footage and reported it to police, prompting an investigation. The court imposed a fine of 600 Singapore dollars (approximately €400 or US $458). Maximilien avoided a possible prison term, but authorities have not yet decided whether his student pass will be revoked.

Background & Context

Singapore is renowned for stringent public-order regulations aimed at preserving cleanliness and order in public spaces. The city-state’s long-standing bans on items such as chewing gum illustrate its zero-tolerance approach to littering and vandalism. While judicial caning remains a penalty for certain serious offenses, it was not applicable in this case.

Official Statements & Responses

Maximilien’s lawyer told the court that the student was remorseful and now understood that an apparently harmless prank could have far-reaching consequences. Police records indicate that the incident required the replacement of all 500 straws in the dispenser, incurring a direct replacement cost of 5 Singapore dollars (about €3.30). The prosecution noted that the charge of disturbing public order carries a potential sentence of several months’ imprisonment in addition to a fine.

Data & Statistics

  • Fine imposed: 600 SGD (? €400, US $458)
  • Replacement cost for straws: 5 SGD (? €3.30)
  • Number of straws in dispenser: 500

Why It Matters

The case underscores Singapore’s rigorous enforcement of public-order laws, even for seemingly minor infractions captured on social media. It serves as a cautionary example for residents and visitors that viral online stunts can trigger legal consequences, including substantial fines and potential immigration repercussions. The incident also highlights the broader debate over how digital culture intersects with strict regulatory environments.