Full Breakdown
FIFA Opens Fast-Track Tender to Study 64-Team World Cup Expansion for 2030
7/31/2026, 8:13:07 PM
FIFA Launches Tender for Expansion Impact Study
FIFA has issued a research brief seeking a consultancy to assess the economic and sporting implications of expanding the World Cup from the current 48-team format to 64 teams for the 2030 tournament. The brief calls for estimates of ticketing, sponsorship and media-rights revenue under the larger format, as well as analysis of player welfare, product quality and calendar effects.
Background to the Proposal
The expansion idea has been championed by South America’s governing body CONMEBOL, whose president Alejandro Domínguez revived the concept after the 2026 finals. FIFA President Gianni Infantino indicated on 12 July that the issue would be examined by the relevant committees after the 2026 World Cup. Historically, the tournament featured 32 teams from 1998 through 2022; the current 48-team format was introduced for the 2026 edition.
Timeline of the Research Tender
- Proposals from research agencies must be submitted by 7 August.
- The contract award is scheduled for 14 August.
- The selected firm has four weeks to complete the analysis, with a delivery deadline of 11 September, after which FIFA could decide on the expansion within the year.
Stakeholder Reactions
UEFA and CONCACAF have publicly opposed the plan, threatening to boycott future tournaments if FIFA proceeds. Critics argue that the accelerated timetable raises governance concerns, noting that member associations were not informed before the tender was released. Supporters, led by CONMEBOL, argue the larger field would allow more nations—potentially each host country for the 2030 event (Morocco, Portugal, Spain, plus matches in Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay)—to host a full group stage.
Core Elements of the Research Brief
The brief requests an “estimated revenue” figure for the 64-team format, covering ticket sales, sponsorship and broadcast rights. It also asks for an assessment of how different stakeholders might support or resist the change, with particular attention to player welfare, the quality of the competition and the impact on the international match calendar.
