Drooid Logo
Back to story perspectives

Full Breakdown

Federal Judge Holds DHS in Contempt Over Delayed Cellphone Imaging

8/6/2026, 9:56:48 AM

Legal Background and Discovery Order

U.S. District Judge Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong (Central District of California) ordered the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in January to produce forensic images of personal cellphones used by more than 800 immigration agents during a series of Los Angeles raids in 2025. The order was part of a class-action lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and other advocacy groups that allege the phones contain evidence of racial profiling.

Agency Response and Penalties

DHS initially claimed agents did not use personal devices for work-related texts, a position later contradicted by testimony from five agents. The agency later disclosed that it was processing three phones every two weeks, a pace that would require almost four years to complete. Judge Frimpong imposed a $500 daily fine for non-compliance and ordered reimbursement of plaintiffs’ legal fees. On July 28, the court noted DHS had been given “plenty of time” and held the agency in civil contempt, resulting in a $3,500 payment to satisfy the fine.

Advocacy Criticism

The ACLU and its attorneys argue the delayed imaging “thwarts” the court order and hides a pattern of racial profiling. Text messages and body-camera footage cited by the plaintiffs include slurs such as “wet” and “tonks” used to identify working-class Latinos.

Official Statements & Responses

The agency has not commented further on whether the use of the term “tonks” violates internal policy.

Verbatim Quotes

  • “Given that Plaintiffs have shown by clear and convincing evidence that the Defendants violated a specific and definite order of the court, the burden shifted to Defendants to demonstrate why they were unable to comply,” — Mensah Frimpong, district judge
  • “Not only are federal agents violating the Constitution on the streets, the government is violating court orders by intentionally withholding critical evidence about its immigration enforcement operations.” — Mayra Joachin